AMERICAN SCIENTISTS set to ANNOUNCE FUSION ENERGY BREAKTHROUGH

Author: oromagi

Posts

Total: 11
oromagi
oromagi's avatar
Debates: 117
Posts: 8,689
8
10
11
oromagi's avatar
oromagi
8
10
11
US scientists set to announce fusion energy breakthrough
By MICHAEL PHILLIS, JENNIFER McDERMOTT, MADDIE BURAKOFF and MATTHEW DALY@APNEWS
48 minutes ago

WASHINGTON (AP) — Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm was set to announce a “major scientific breakthrough” Tuesday in the decades-long quest to harness fusion, the energy that powers the sun and stars.

Researchers at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in California for the first time produced more energy in a fusion reaction than was used to ignite it, something called net energy gain, according to one government official and one scientist familiar with the research. Both spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the breakthrough ahead of the announcement.

Granholm was scheduled to appear alongside Livermore researchers at a morning event in Washington. The Department of Energy declined to give details ahead of time. The news was first reported by the Financial Times.

Proponents of fusion hope that it could one day produce nearly limitless, carbon-free energy, displacing fossil fuels and other traditional energy sources. Producing energy that powers homes and businesses from fusion is still decades away. But researchers said it was a significant step nonetheless.

“It’s almost like it’s a starting gun going off,” said Professor Dennis Whyte, director of the Plasma Science and Fusion Center at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and a leader in fusion research. “We should be pushing towards making fusion energy systems available to tackle climate change and energy security.”

Net energy gain has been an elusive goal because fusion happens at such high temperatures and pressures that it is incredibly difficult to control.
Fusion works by pressing hydrogen atoms into each other with such force that they combine into helium, releasing enormous amounts of energy and heat. Unlike other nuclear reactions, it doesn’t create radioactive waste.

Billions of dollars and decades of work have gone into fusion research that has produced exhilarating results — for fractions of a second. Previously, researchers at the National Ignition Facility, the division of Lawrence Livermore where the success took place, used 192 lasers and temperatures multiple times hotter than the center of the sun to create an extremely brief fusion reaction.

The lasers focus an enormous amount of heat on a small metal can. The result is a superheated plasma environment where fusion may occur.

Riccardo Betti, a professor at the University of Rochester and expert in laser fusion, said an announcement that net energy had been gained in a fusion reaction would be significant. But he said there’s a long road ahead before the result generates sustainable electricity.

He likened the breakthrough to when humans first learned that refining oil into gasoline and igniting it could produce an explosion.

“You still don’t have the engine and you still don’t have the tires,” Betti said. “You can’t say that you have a car.”

The net energy gain achievement applied to the fusion reaction itself, not the total amount of power it took to operate the lasers and run the project. For fusion to be viable, it will need to produce significantly more power and for longer.

It is incredibly difficult to control the physics of stars. Whyte said it has been challenging to reach this point because the fuel has to be hotter than the center of the sun. The fuel does not want to stay hot -- it wants to leak out and get cold. Containing it is an incredible challenge, he said.

Net energy gain isn’t a huge surprise from the California lab because of progress it had already made, according to Jeremy Chittenden, a professor at Imperial College in London specializing in plasma physics.

“That doesn’t take away from the fact that this is a significant milestone,” he said.

It takes enormous resources and effort to advance fusion research. One approach turns hydrogen into plasma, an electrically charged gas, which is then controlled by humongous magnets. This method is being explored in France in a collaboration among 35 countries called the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor as well as by researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and a private company.

Last year the teams working on those projects in two continents announced significant advancements in the vital magnets needed for their work
___
Mathew Daly reported from Washington. Maddie Burakoff reported from New York, Michael Phillis from St. Louis and Jennifer McDermott from Providence, R.I.
___
Associated Press climate and environmental coverage receives support from several private foundations. See more about AP’s climate initiative here. The AP is solely responsible for all content.


oromagi
oromagi's avatar
Debates: 117
Posts: 8,689
8
10
11
oromagi's avatar
oromagi
8
10
11
EXPLAINER: Why fusion could be a clean-energy breakthrough today

The Department of Energy is planning an announcement Tuesday about a “major scientific breakthrough” at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, one of several sites worldwide where researchers have been trying to develop the possibility of harnessing energy from nuclear fusion.

It’s a technology that has the potential to one day accelerate the planet’s shift away from fossil fuels, which are the major contributors to climate change. The technology has long struggled with daunting challenges.

Here’s a look at exactly what nuclear fusion is, and some of the difficulties in turning it into the cheap and carbon-free energy source that scientists believe it can be.

WHAT IS NUCLEAR FUSION?
Look up, and it’s happening right above you — nuclear fusion reactions power the sun and other stars.

The reaction happens when two light nuclei merge to form a single heavier nucleus. Because the total mass of that single nucleus is less than the mass of the two original nuclei, the leftover mass is energy that is released in the process, according to the Department of Energy.

In the case of the sun, its intense heat — millions of degrees Celsius — and the pressure exerted by its gravity allow atoms that would otherwise repel each other to fuse.

Scientists have long understood how nuclear fusion has worked and have been trying to duplicate the process on Earth as far back as the 1930s. Current efforts focus on fusing a pair of hydrogen isotopes — deuterium and tritium — according to the Department of Energy, which says that particular combination releases “much more energy than most fusion reactions” and requires less heat to do so.

HOW VALUABLE WOULD THIS BE?
Daniel Kammen, a professor of energy and society at the University of California at Berkeley, said nuclear fusion offers the possibility of “basically unlimited” fuel if the technology can be made commercially viable. The elements needed are available in seawater.

It’s also a process that doesn’t produce the radioactive waste of nuclear fission, Kammen said.

HOW ARE SCIENTISTS TRYING TO DO THIS?
One way scientists have tried to recreate nuclear fusion involves what’s called a tokamak — a doughnut-shaped vacuum chamber that uses powerful magnets to turn fuel into a superheated plasma (between 150 million and 300 million degrees Celsius) where fusion may occur.

The Livermore lab uses a different technique, with researchers firing a 192-beam laser at a small capsule filled with deuterium-tritium fuel. The lab reported that an August 2021 test produced 1.35 megajoules of fusion energy — about 70% of the energy fired at the target. The lab said several subsequent experiments showed declining results, but researchers believed they had identified ways to improve the quality of the fuel capsule and the lasers’ symmetry.

“The most critical feature of moving fusion from theory to commercial reality is getting more energy out than in,” Kammen said.
___
Associated Press climate and environmental coverage receives support from several private foundations. See more about AP’s climate initiative here. The AP is solely responsible for all content.


zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 11,223
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@oromagi
We already have limitless energy delivered for free everyday from our nearby life giving star.

We just fail to utilise it.
SirAnonymous
SirAnonymous's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 4,140
3
7
10
SirAnonymous's avatar
SirAnonymous
3
7
10
It's a huge breakthrough, but fusion power plants are still many years in the future. Reproducing these results, scaling them up, and making them commercially viable will take time.

But if they can do it, it will be a huge step forward.
oromagi
oromagi's avatar
Debates: 117
Posts: 8,689
8
10
11
oromagi's avatar
oromagi
8
10
11
-->
@SirAnonymous
It's a huge breakthrough, but fusion power plants are still many years in the future. Reproducing these results, scaling them up, and making them commercially viable will take time.

But if they can do it, it will be a huge step forward.
  • twenty years, they say
  • But the moment mankind developed a processs that creates more energy than it uses deserves marking.

Public-Choice
Public-Choice's avatar
Debates: 18
Posts: 1,035
3
4
8
Public-Choice's avatar
Public-Choice
3
4
8
-->
@oromagi
For the third time in 10 years. All of these "breakthroughs" somehow never seem to be applicable or even worth the investment though.
Reece101
Reece101's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 1,904
3
2
2
Reece101's avatar
Reece101
3
2
2
-->
@oromagi
@SirAnonymous
Tritium is exceedingly rare. It won’t be commercially practical from my understanding, though the research scientists get out of this will be invaluable.
ebuc
ebuc's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,243
3
2
4
ebuc's avatar
ebuc
3
2
4
-->
@zedvictor4
We already have limitless energy delivered for free everyday from our nearby life giving star. We just fail to utilise it.
Good point Zed. And that includes the other renewables. Wind ergo ocean waves, tides via the moon, and an abundance of gravity induced falling water/hydro.

.." is nuclear power green"...
As Sabene Hossenfelder  ---a pragmatist---- points out in the vid, even if we went full blown nuclear, it will not come on line soon enough to deflate the oncoming human induced climate crisis. Same goes for fusion, even if it were to pan out ----i.e. a refined technology--- to change the oncoming climate crisis.

Tritium is exceedingly rare. It won’t be commercially practical from my understanding, though the research scientists get out of this will be invaluable.

..."This wasn’t ordinary hydrogen but its rare radioactive isotope tritium, in which two neutrons and a proton cling together in the nucleus. At $30,000 per gram, it’s almost as precious as a diamond, but for fusion researchers the price is worth paying.".....

..."The available tritium stockpile—thought to be about 25 kilograms today—will peak before the end of the decade and begin a steady decline as it is sold off and decays, according to projections in ITER’s 2018 research plan...."



YouFound_Lxam
YouFound_Lxam's avatar
Debates: 32
Posts: 2,125
3
4
7
YouFound_Lxam's avatar
YouFound_Lxam
3
4
7
We already have limitless energy delivered for free everyday from our nearby life giving star.

We just fail to utilise it.
No, we just don't have enough resources ourselves to utilize it. 

For instance, we don't have an infinite supplied of PV cells for our solar panels.
We have to mine materials for those.

But you do have a point in saying we don't utilize it as much as we could. That is true. 
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 11,223
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
Trouble is, we have this overriding system of social control known as money.

And society has to be controlled because people are fundamentally selfish individuals, that tend to cluster into selfish groups.

We're not bees that will work for the greater good of the greater society.


So we have the resources and intellectual ability, but lack the collective will.

The downside of intellect I suppose.
ebuc
ebuc's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,243
3
2
4
ebuc's avatar
ebuc
3
2
4
-->
@zedvictor4
The downside of intellect I suppose.

Meta-space mind over occupied space  matter { gray? } 

Mind over matter { Mary Baker Eddy 1821 - 1910 } churches are dying out.

..."It seems likely that Mrs. Eddy’s most lasting legacies will be the Christian Science Monitor, and her feminist emphasis on God as Mother, as well as Father. "...


Pete Townshend levitating on stage https://www.ebay.com/itm/162694104675?_trkparms=amclksrc%3DITM%26aid%3D1110006%26algo%3DHOMESPLICE.SIM%26ao%3D1%26asc%3D244204%26meid%3Dfc6a63cc84d54124beae6a79dc0be0c3%26pid%3D101196%26rk%3D5%26rkt%3D12%26sd%3D224966156314%26itm%3D162694104675%26pmt%3D1%26noa%3D0%26pg%3D2047675%26algv%3DSimplAMLv5PairwiseWebWithBBEV2bAndUBSourceDemotionWithUltimatelyBoughtOfCoviewV1&_trksid=p2047675.c101196.m2219&amdata=cksum%3A162694104675fc6a63cc84d54124beae6a79dc0be0c3%7Cenc%3AAQAHAAABMIep8YrnpoI5Ip1Fr26ya5Zdwg2V78Yl01uYLsdPZcFTvxKxDts2M2LiSIpUM3yyPCg4I%252FI%252F%252BBr%252B3lbC%252BxYqInYGBmzIxc4EMw3YF0EDxTKyKG8esyfYa5TwWYYq2zGtsAGfTLLC0skwla9FzkX%252Fv3ctYL6%252FiE46LmXDaGTxD5DzyrgBi1vdnBkKZz05Jy64mNAljsA3Tn7%252F9WzdC1jx6igPYlkTGj%252FD1BYac1L7x7B3ih1vFxW0ZpRnaR9EoxL%252BM4SuWRX%252FRKJglTAV24HKbhATkm%252BUQFKB8yW8JFEAMxk%252F5ErmK3vXCrCQGRqypu2N53t1CV8PPzwJt291EKhUVHbKM4ZBFmY7B3Bms0%252B3MH9MaYINnf1aK0TNYeRzToQLJhTgbW%252F0crs97xWivNFI9C8%253D%7Campid%3APL_CLK%7Cclp%3A2047675