is any thing false?

Author: keithprosser ,

Posts

Total: 16
keithprosser
keithprosser's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 3,053
2
3
3
keithprosser's avatar
keithprosser
2
3
3
I deliberately wrote 'any thing' not 'anything' because it's obvious statements expressing falsehoods exist - 2=2=5 for example.  But there is no actual case or instance of 2 plus 2 making 5 in the universe - ie 2+2=5 does not describe any actual 'thing'.

The true exists, the false does not exist.  Discuss!

drafterman
drafterman's avatar
Debates: 6
Posts: 5,659
3
6
9
drafterman's avatar
drafterman
3
6
9
What?
keithprosser
keithprosser's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 3,053
2
3
3
keithprosser's avatar
keithprosser
2
3
3
I wish ordinary language was easer to use... unfortunately it was invented to deal with hunting zebras and gathering nuts not for doing ontological epistemology!

It seems to me we have true/real/exists on one side and false/unreal/'un-exists' on the other.   We use those words but I don't tremember ever learning what they mean how they relate to each other.   I've never looked them up in a dictionary.   So what is the difference between something that is true and something that is false?   More to the point, perhaps we don't need seperate words for true, real and exists if we can define term in terms of each other, along the lines that 'the true=the real=the existing' and 'the false=the unreal=the non-existent'.

It's just an idea to kick around - I'm a bit bored with the current threads!



TheDredPriateRoberts
TheDredPriateRoberts's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 3,360
3
3
6
TheDredPriateRoberts's avatar
TheDredPriateRoberts
3
3
6
does anyone really know what time it is.....does anyone really care......(classic oldies)

can a "thing" be false is what I understand  you are asking, which would be no.  what I'm thinking about is a thing that seems like what it is but in fact is a fake or something different.  it's not the things fault but rather our perception of what and how it should be.  That glass of water, because we assume it's water, we are told it's water is actually a glass of vodka.

"it is what it is" seems most appropriate.
drafterman
drafterman's avatar
Debates: 6
Posts: 5,659
3
6
9
drafterman's avatar
drafterman
3
6
9
I wish ordinary language was easer to use... unfortunately it was invented to deal with hunting zebras and gathering nuts not for doing ontological epistemology!
People have been using ordinary language to constructively discuss ontology and epistemology for millennia.

It seems to me we have true/real/exists on one side and false/unreal/'un-exists' on the other.
Ok...

We use those words but I don't tremember ever learning what they mean how they relate to each other. I've never looked them up in a dictionary.
You want me to google it for you?

So what is the difference between something that is true and something that is false?
Depends on the context. What is your context?

More to the point, perhaps we don't need seperate words for true, real and exists if we can define term in terms of each other, along the lines that 'the true=the real=the existing' and 'the false=the unreal=the non-existent'.
I don't see the point in this.
keithprosser
keithprosser's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 3,053
2
3
3
keithprosser's avatar
keithprosser
2
3
3
People have been using ordinary language to constructively discuss ontology and epistemology for millennia.
But how successfully?  I seems to me that many threads on DA degenerate into trading dictionary definitions.



drafterman
drafterman's avatar
Debates: 6
Posts: 5,659
3
6
9
drafterman's avatar
drafterman
3
6
9
--> @keithprosser
What is your measurement of success?
TwoMan
TwoMan's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 309
1
2
3
TwoMan's avatar
TwoMan
1
2
3
DPRoberts has it right.
If a thing exists, nothing inherent in that thing is true or false. A statement about a thing can be true or false. Perceptions, thoughts, assumptions, etc. can be true or false.
I would say truth is a human concept that defines or clarifies reality.
secularmerlin
secularmerlin's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,199
3
3
3
secularmerlin's avatar
secularmerlin
3
3
3
--> @TwoMan
A purely linguistic or intellectual convention. Subjective.
3RU7AL
3RU7AL's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 9,128
3
4
8
3RU7AL's avatar
3RU7AL
3
4
8
--> @TwoMan
DPRoberts has it right.
If a thing exists, nothing inherent in that thing is true or false. A statement about a thing can be true or false. Perceptions, thoughts, assumptions, etc. can be true or false.
I would say truth is a human concept that defines or clarifies reality.
Well stated.
keithprosser
keithprosser's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 3,053
2
3
3
keithprosser's avatar
keithprosser
2
3
3
--> @TwoMan
I would say truth is a human concept that defines or clarifies reality.
I might say "Truth is a property of the real; falsehood(/untruth?) is a property of the unreal".  That applies independently of humans.  

TwoMan
TwoMan's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 309
1
2
3
TwoMan's avatar
TwoMan
1
2
3
--> @keithprosser
I might say "Truth is a property of the real; falsehood(/untruth?) is a property of the unreal".  That applies independently of humans.  
I would have to disagree that truth and/or falsehood is a "property". I think it is a human conceived "verification of properties" of reality.

This is probably just a semantics disagreement.
keithprosser
keithprosser's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 3,053
2
3
3
keithprosser's avatar
keithprosser
2
3
3
--> @TwoMan
I wouldn't be at all surprised! 
Mopac
Mopac's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 8,050
3
4
7
Mopac's avatar
Mopac
3
4
7
A false existence is a nonexistence.

A nonexistence doesn't exist 

Right?


Now if you were to take a false existence as an existence that is not another existence, it would still be an existence. The "false thing" would be like, "Oh, I thought that was a dog, but it was actually a sheep. It is a false dog.". That is a different animal altogether.

Perception tricks and illusion go together.

keithprosser
keithprosser's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 3,053
2
3
3
keithprosser's avatar
keithprosser
2
3
3
--> @Mopac
I'm thinking that 'real' and 'exists' (+their opposites)mean essentially the same thing and apply to objects while 'true/false' applies to propostions.

Mopac
Mopac's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 8,050
3
4
7
Mopac's avatar
Mopac
3
4
7
--> @keithprosser
Pretty much.

How about "being"


"the quality or state of having existence"


Very related. Exist, real, being... you'll often find these words or variations in the definitions concerning these concepts.