Reality a just a mental construct

Author: Fallaneze ,

Posts

Total: 24
Fallaneze
Fallaneze's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 948
2
2
5
Fallaneze's avatar
Fallaneze
2
2
5
Everything you see has no independent existence. We're living in a virtual world. 
secularmerlin
secularmerlin's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,230
3
3
3
secularmerlin's avatar
secularmerlin
3
3
3
--> @Fallaneze
How have you determined that this is the case?
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 352
Posts: 11,307
10
10
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
10
11
--> @Fallaneze
It's a simulation but not a mental construct. You are implying something like the Matrix where you're one of the 'real characters' but this type of solipsism isn't just insane it missed an extremely vital clue throughout the whole Matrix trilogy; they're still in the simulation even in their 'real world'.

You need to learn to appreciate everyone and everything as 'real' but accept that evil can happen anyway, even at your hand directly or indirectly be it by you buying meat, by you doing this or that whatever. Shit happens to real beings that suffer real agony at the hands of others in reality. The hardest part isn't learning to forgive yourself, the hard part is learning to want to be the good guy/girl in spite of the ill things you've done.
Fallaneze
Fallaneze's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 948
2
2
5
Fallaneze's avatar
Fallaneze
2
2
5
--> @RationalMadman
I believe other people are real too, in terms of their inner person or soul or whatever, but I just don't believe that anything perceived has independent existence. The world is a construct of information-processing. It's an assimilation of mental properties that have no independent existence.
Fallaneze
Fallaneze's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 948
2
2
5
Fallaneze's avatar
Fallaneze
2
2
5
--> @secularmerlin
Everything we perceive is comprised of mental properties that have no independent existence. Shapes, colors, textures, sounds, etc. 

RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 352
Posts: 11,307
10
10
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
10
11
--> @Fallaneze
Alright, I agree then, like fully agree.
secularmerlin
secularmerlin's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,230
3
3
3
secularmerlin's avatar
secularmerlin
3
3
3
--> @Fallaneze
Ah so in the sense that we never experience reality directly even if our experience does accurately reflect reality? I agree ypur brain is not an eye ball nor an ear drum and neither eyeballs nor eardrums seem to have experiences on their own.
keithprosser
keithprosser's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 3,053
2
3
3
keithprosser's avatar
keithprosser
2
3
3
--> @secularmerlin
I get the impression Fallaneze is edging towards full-on idealism.

I'd say idealism is irrefutable but has no interesting consequences.  it doesn't seem to matter if it is true or not, unless you're smoking pot around a campfire!
TwoMan
TwoMan's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 309
1
2
3
TwoMan's avatar
TwoMan
1
2
3
--> @keithprosser
I'd say idealism is irrefutable but has no interesting consequences.
That depends on which part of idealism you are talking about. That everything is mental and immaterial, not very interesting. That consciousness is the pre-condition of the material universe, that sounds interesting to me. It's an idea that could be refined to make a little more sense.

keithprosser
keithprosser's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 3,053
2
3
3
keithprosser's avatar
keithprosser
2
3
3
--> @TwoMan
I principally meant the former.   I always refuse to engage with guys who have just discovered idealism and are over-excited by it - idealism is a phase we all go through, mostly in our teens.   Godel's theorem and memes are other fads...

Do you refer to the role of consciousness in some interpretations of QM?  


TwoMan
TwoMan's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 309
1
2
3
TwoMan's avatar
TwoMan
1
2
3
--> @keithprosser
Do you refer to the role of consciousness in some interpretations of QM?  
No, I was referring to existence itself. That consciousness is a fundamental aspect of existence rather than an emergent property is an interesting idea to me (not in a deistic way).

keithprosser
keithprosser's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 3,053
2
3
3
keithprosser's avatar
keithprosser
2
3
3
--> @TwoMan
Consciousness is the itch I can't scratch.  

My intition is that consciousness somehow emerges from matter, so matter is 'more fundamental' than mind.   I don't know that is true and quite often when i think about 'the hard problem' I begin to doubt it!  

Sad thing is I read a lot about consciusness a few decades ago and there hasn't been any progress since to keep abreast of since.  Artiicial intelligene has made a bit of progress, but artificial consciousness is nowhere on the horizon.
    

TwoMan
TwoMan's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 309
1
2
3
TwoMan's avatar
TwoMan
1
2
3
--> @keithprosser
Yes it makes me wonder whether it is even worth contemplating something which can not be know. In other words, if I can't know the answer then is the question worth asking?
keithprosser
keithprosser's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 3,053
2
3
3
keithprosser's avatar
keithprosser
2
3
3
--> @TwoMan
I think I've learned a lot by thinking about ways that consciousness can't work!

The way I look at it is that now I know I don't know about things that I used to not know I didn't know about not knowing.  That's progress!
TwoMan
TwoMan's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 309
1
2
3
TwoMan's avatar
TwoMan
1
2
3
--> @keithprosser
The way I look at it is that now I know I don't know about things that I used to not know I didn't know about not knowing.  That's progress!
Well said.

mustardness
mustardness's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,987
2
2
3
mustardness's avatar
mustardness
2
2
3
--> @keithprosser
Consciousness is the itch I can't scratch. 
No, consciousness is the act experience of scratching, ---see all nervous system animals---, and sometimes there is more access to metaphysical-1, mind/intellect/concepts. 

My intition is that consciousness somehow emerges from matter, so matter is 'more fundamental' than mind.   I don't know that is true and quite often when i think about 'the hard problem' I begin to doubt it!  
Matter experience ergo consciousness{ nerovus system } precedes access to metaphysical-1, mind/intellect/concepts.  No nervous system = no access. Simple minimal brainer when  refine our definitions of what exists.

Sad thing is I read a lot about consciusness a few decades ago and there hasn't been any progress since to keep abreast of since.  Artiicial intelligene has made a bit of progress, but artificial consciousness is nowhere on the horizon.
Lee Smolin---"we will know more in the future".. from his 2nd book, 3 Roads to Quantum Gravity or his or his first book


Analgesic.Spectre
Analgesic.Spectre's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 474
1
1
5
Analgesic.Spectre's avatar
Analgesic.Spectre
1
1
5
--> @Fallaneze
Everything you see has no independent existence. We're living in a virtual world. 
Yep, because nothing existed before humans.

*facepalm*

Fallaneze
Fallaneze's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 948
2
2
5
Fallaneze's avatar
Fallaneze
2
2
5
--> @Analgesic.Spectre
The designer(s) of the program 
Analgesic.Spectre
Analgesic.Spectre's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 474
1
1
5
Analgesic.Spectre's avatar
Analgesic.Spectre
1
1
5
--> @Fallaneze
The designer(s) of the program 
Please prove that they existed before humans.

Fallaneze
Fallaneze's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 948
2
2
5
Fallaneze's avatar
Fallaneze
2
2
5
--> @Analgesic.Spectre
I have a "first cause" topic on this issue.  
Analgesic.Spectre
Analgesic.Spectre's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 474
1
1
5
Analgesic.Spectre's avatar
Analgesic.Spectre
1
1
5
--> @Fallaneze
I have a "first cause" topic on this issue. 


Fallaneze
Fallaneze's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 948
2
2
5
Fallaneze's avatar
Fallaneze
2
2
5
--> @Analgesic.Spectre
I had Quantum fluctuations in mind when I wrote my argument.
Analgesic.Spectre
Analgesic.Spectre's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 474
1
1
5
Analgesic.Spectre's avatar
Analgesic.Spectre
1
1
5
--> @Fallaneze
If only you understood them...
Fallaneze
Fallaneze's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 948
2
2
5
Fallaneze's avatar
Fallaneze
2
2
5
--> @Analgesic.Spectre
Do quantum fluctuations have free will?