What's the strongest argument for atheism?

Author: Fallaneze ,

Posts

Total: 309
Fallaneze
Fallaneze's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 948
2
2
5
Fallaneze's avatar
Fallaneze
2
2
5
I'd like to hear any strong arguments you might have for atheism.

disgusted
disgusted's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,959
2
3
3
disgusted's avatar
disgusted
2
3
3
--> @Fallaneze
Man makes gods.
TwoMan
TwoMan's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 309
1
2
3
TwoMan's avatar
TwoMan
1
2
3
My only argument would be that without evidence, there is no reason to believe in theism.

Fallaneze
Fallaneze's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 948
2
2
5
Fallaneze's avatar
Fallaneze
2
2
5
--> @TwoMan
But that means your position on the claim "God exists" is that it's neither more plausibly true nor more plausibly false.
TwoMan
TwoMan's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 309
1
2
3
TwoMan's avatar
TwoMan
1
2
3
--> @Fallaneze
But that means your position on the claim "God exists" is that it's neither more plausibly true nor more plausibly false.
Yes, I suppose it does mean that.

disgusted
disgusted's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,959
2
3
3
disgusted's avatar
disgusted
2
3
3
--> @Fallaneze
My position in regard to the claim "gods exist" is that the claim has no evidentiary support and is therefore false,  gods don't exist.
Fallaneze
Fallaneze's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 948
2
2
5
Fallaneze's avatar
Fallaneze
2
2
5
--> @TwoMan
So even the slightest bit of information favoring the existence of God would make you a believer?

Fallaneze
Fallaneze's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 948
2
2
5
Fallaneze's avatar
Fallaneze
2
2
5
--> @disgusted
Is absence of evidence evidence of absence?
disgusted
disgusted's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,959
2
3
3
disgusted's avatar
disgusted
2
3
3
--> @Fallaneze
Obviously. But proving not favouring.
disgusted
disgusted's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,959
2
3
3
disgusted's avatar
disgusted
2
3
3
--> @Fallaneze
Yes if you propose without any evidence that something outside of reality interacts with reality, but that something doesn't leave the evidence that such an interaction would reasonably be expected to leave.
Fallaneze
Fallaneze's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 948
2
2
5
Fallaneze's avatar
Fallaneze
2
2
5
--> @disgusted
Basing a conclusion on lack of evidence is an argument from ignorance 
disgusted
disgusted's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,959
2
3
3
disgusted's avatar
disgusted
2
3
3
--> @Fallaneze
Basing a conclusion as to the veracity of a claim is all about evidence, if there is no evidence supporting the claim then the claim is false and must be dismissed, in effect nullifying said claim ergo said claim does no longer exist in reality, it is a nonsense.
keithprosser
keithprosser's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 3,053
2
3
3
keithprosser's avatar
keithprosser
2
3
3
--> @Fallaneze
Is absence of evidence evidence of absence?
Well, how can you you be sure there's no elephant in your fridge?

coal
coal's avatar
Debates: 5
Posts: 1,486
3
3
9
coal's avatar
coal
3
3
9
--> @keithprosser
Elephants don't present the same metaphysical problems that belief in the divine would.
secularmerlin
secularmerlin's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,199
3
3
3
secularmerlin's avatar
secularmerlin
3
3
3
--> @Fallaneze
The default position is skepticism.
keithprosser
keithprosser's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 3,053
2
3
3
keithprosser's avatar
keithprosser
2
3
3
--> @coal
Elephants don't present the same metaphysical problems that belief in the divine would.
I know little of metaphysics.   I was addressing "Is absence of evidence evidence of absence?".

The answer is often assumed to be no, but just ain't so!  Very often it is.
Fallaneze
Fallaneze's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 948
2
2
5
Fallaneze's avatar
Fallaneze
2
2
5
--> @keithprosser
When taking into account my background knowledge that elephants live on a different continent, the dimensions of an elephant, the cubic feet of my fridge, and my daily observations in and around my fridge, all indicates that there is not an elephant in my fridge. If someone were to ask me if I was sure that there was no elephant in my fridge I would say yes. I have much more information indicating that the claim is false rather than true. 






Fallaneze
Fallaneze's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 948
2
2
5
Fallaneze's avatar
Fallaneze
2
2
5
--> @secularmerlin
Skepticism isn't a worldview though.
Fallaneze
Fallaneze's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 948
2
2
5
Fallaneze's avatar
Fallaneze
2
2
5
--> @keithprosser
It depends on how you define the word "evidence."

When we imagine a situation where we observe the absence of something, like the absence of an elephant in my fridge, I'd consider this evidence of absence - not absence of evidence. I am basing my conclusion that there is not an elephant in my fridge on information that indicates the truth of the claim (evidence).
keithprosser
keithprosser's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 3,053
2
3
3
keithprosser's avatar
keithprosser
2
3
3
--> @Fallaneze
I refer you to my reply to coal. (#16).

I think with minor adustments what you posted in #17 would make a fair argument why god [probably] does not exist.



secularmerlin
secularmerlin's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,199
3
3
3
secularmerlin's avatar
secularmerlin
3
3
3
--> @Fallaneze
Neither is atheism.
Fallaneze
Fallaneze's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 948
2
2
5
Fallaneze's avatar
Fallaneze
2
2
5
--> @keithprosser
If the posited defintion of God includes physical characteristics then sure, you could run an inductive argument against God using the same logic I used with the elephant in my fridge. 
Fallaneze
Fallaneze's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 948
2
2
5
Fallaneze's avatar
Fallaneze
2
2
5
--> @secularmerlin
But that means your position on the claim "God exists" is that it's neither more plausibly true nor more plausibly false.

Even the slightest bit of information favoring the existence of God would make you a believer?


secularmerlin
secularmerlin's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,199
3
3
3
secularmerlin's avatar
secularmerlin
3
3
3
--> @Fallaneze
It would take sufficient evidence. Beliefs are not a choice. One cannot simply choose to believe something that one considers false.
Fallaneze
Fallaneze's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 948
2
2
5
Fallaneze's avatar
Fallaneze
2
2
5
--> @secularmerlin
Is there sufficient evidence when there's more information indicating that the claim is true rather than false?