Instigator / Con
11
1378
rating
36
debates
38.89%
won
Topic
#1258

Homosexuality is Immoral

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Better arguments
3
3
Better sources
4
4
Better legibility
2
2
Better conduct
2
2

After 2 votes and with the same amount of points on both sides...

It's a tie!
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
4
Time for argument
One week
Max argument characters
10,000
Voting period
Two weeks
Point system
Multiple criterions
Voting system
Open
Contender / Pro
11
1395
rating
22
debates
20.45%
won
Description

My opponent will be arguing that homosexuality is immoral. I will be arguing that it is not immoral. If you are planning to use quotes or statistics, do not forget to cite your sources.

-->
@CommanderCornJuice

*******************************************************************
>Reported Vote: CommanderCornJuice // Mod action: [Removed]
>Points Awarded: 4 points to pro for arguments and conduct.

>Reason for Decision: His reasoning about the AIDS, confused children, devastated wives, etc. just shows how it impacts people around them including themselves. The AIDS through needles (most likely blood transfusions) show that being can actually hurt (and sometimes kill) others. If you normally hurt or kill someone, you can be charged for assault, manslaughter, homicide, etc. It was also a very good point when he explained the difference between Civil Law, Moral Law, and Ceremonial Law. Therefore, I think he proved the point of the argument, which may I remind you all, is whether homosexuality is immoral, not whether you support it or not.

Reason for Mod Action>This vote is not eligible to vote. In order to vote, an account must: (1) Read the site’s COC AND have completed 2 non-troll/non-FF debate OR have 100 forum posts.

In addition, the voter does not justify either arguments or conduct as required. The voters does not survey and weigh arguments the main arguments; nor provides any explanation of conduct.

To award arguments, the voter must (1) survey the main arguments and counterarguments in the debate, (2) weigh those arguments and counterarguments against each other, and (3) explain, based on the weighing process, how they reached their decision.

*******************************************************************

-->
@DapperMack

Thank you for voting!

Trying to get someone to accept this again?......

Con even has an angle to take that will counter a lot of Pro's arguments:

That it isn't homosexuality that's evil, only acting on it that is.

This troll-angle is extremely powerful if Con does it correctly because it leaves voters who aren't dedicated to voting against Con, the ability to side with Con from two totally opposing angles on homosexuality as an act in and of itself.

whoever accepts to be publiclay shamed as this site is VERY po homos