what is god...
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
After 2 votes and with 6 points ahead, the winner is...
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 5
- Time for argument
- One week
- Max argument characters
- 10,000
- Voting period
- One week
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
- Open
No information
" I believe that god is not a system because systems are made by people"
"and we have found no proof of a force designed to make sure everything is working in a way to create humans."
"God is a living force with a mind of its own"
"willing to help"
"this explains why there are glitches in the universe and why some people think our universe is a simulation"
Both forfeited every round after the first, but con made a strong counter argument (catching built in contradictions, using historical examples to add even more, etc.) which as the cut-off point for the debate, with plenty of opportunity to be defended against, takes home the argument points.
"i believe that god is not a force because a force with no mind cannot do anything except for the what it is meant to do... and we have found no proof of a force designed to make sure everything is working in a way to create humans. if god is a force then we wouldn't call him a god."
"God is a living force with a mind of its own"
This complete contradiction presented by Pro (which Con addressed) basically killed whatever point they had to begin with. Pro started out with three premises: that god is not a person, system, or force... and then goes on to conclude that god is a force. That and the fact that Con rebutted the points presented by Pro gives Con the win in the argument category.
Neither side used sources, the minor S&G mistakes made by Pro don't dramatically impede the ability for the audience to understand the main point presented, and Conduct is tied, since they both forfeited 4 rounds.
Wow I feel like Ragnar with the amount of stuff I put into my RFD. <--- Compliment to Ragnar ;)
You should explain your position more in the next round. In the future, make sure to explain your position in the debate description.
sorry if you misinterpreted what i was trying to say... i'm not very good at explaining things... which is why i made the debate have 5 rounds.
my friend looked at my argument and said nothing was wrong with it... she said that nothing was wrong with it... that's because she understands what i'm trying to say. if you wanna understand and continue the argument then try thinking from a 2nd perspective and then a 3rd. then you should understand what i'm talking about fully.... most people think they know but they don't because when they explain it, they never explain what i said correctly
when i say living force i mean a force with a mind kind of its own unlike gravity but a force that has developed. i know that god can't be a person cause the human mind cant understand itself fully there for god as a person could not have created us.
Can you be more specific
ok
living force
What is your stance