Instigator / Pro

1294

rating

debates

18.0%

won

Topic

#1412

Huey Long was what American really needed at his time

Status

Finished

All stages have been completed. The voting points distribution and the result are presented below.

Arguments points

Sources points

Spelling and grammar points

Conduct points

With 1 vote and 1 point ahead, the winner is ...

billbatard

Parameters

More details

Publication date: 09.17.19 12:01PM
Last update date: 10.08.19 04:18AM
Category: Politics
Time for argument: Three days
Voting system: Open voting
Voting period: One week
Point system: Four points
Rating mode: Rated
Characters per argument: 10,000
Required rating: 1

Contender / Con

RationalMadman

1586

rating

319

debates

65.83%

won

Description

~ 249 / 5,000

Huey Long was what the Nation needed at the time https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nMUx4AQl5tI he was authoritarian but was not brutal and helped the poor and he was planning to stop communism, he wanted something else between capitalism and communism

Round 1

billbatard

09.17.19 02:55PM

Pro

Huey long was a thug he had no respect at all fo the constitution , or political niceties such as protocol , but he cared about the common folk so in bad times like he was in, he was the man for the job https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nMUx4AQl5tI

RationalMadman

09.20.19 12:42PM

Con

There is so far zero definition of 'need' and 'really need'.

The context of the debate implies that America couldn't cope without Huey Long as their leader or some such statement. Even if he wasn't leader, why did they need him at all? What is this 'really need' concept anyway? Can you need something that you don't really need or vice versa?

I don't get it.

Round 2

billbatard

09.20.19 04:22PM

Pro

You look at poverty rates today, the rates of inequality today that are just growing and growing FDR did a lot to create the middle class and help unions improve the lives of workers.. Huey LONG would have done more , and made reversing those policies impossible

RationalMadman

09.23.19 04:22PM

Con

Forfeited

Round 3

billbatard

09.23.19 09:49PM

Pro

Every man a king! every man a king every man a millionare!

RationalMadman

09.26.19 07:35PM

Con

1 : necessary duty : OBLIGATION

2 a: a lack of something requisite, desirable, or useful

b: a physiological or psychological requirement for the well-being of an organism

3 : a condition requiring supply or relief

- https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/need

So far, Pro has only proven that to Pro themselves, Huey Long would be desirable. Huey long wasn't what America needed because he never did serve, yet America was fine anyway. He could have been removed entirely from America's history, not even born, and another timeline would occur that Pro can't prove would in any way have left America hampered or unable to exist and/or thrive.

Round 4

billbatard

09.28.19 06:11AM

Pro

Is America fine now? is it? Huey long would have made Reagan impossible

RationalMadman

10.01.19 04:18AM

Con

It is.

RationalMadman

Added: 1 year ago

Contender

--> @David @bsh1

nice vote modding.

Trent0405

Added: 1 year ago

--> @RationalMadman @David

It's not on the voter to determine who has the BoP, correct me if I'm wrong.

It's on the debaters to prove to the voters who has the BoP, you failed to do so in my eyes RM.

Am I correct here, the COC voting guide doesn't state how i'm wrong from what I observed.

bmdrocks21

Added: 1 year ago

I don't even know how to begin judging this. So I won't

RationalMadman

Added: 1 year ago

Contender

--> @Trent0405

How did he prove the need?

RationalMadman

Added: 1 year ago

Contender

--> @David

how does trent explained how our arguments are tied or how Pro met his BoP at all?

billbatard

Added: 1 year ago

Instigator

opponent bad conduct forfiet just sayin

billbatard

Added: 1 year ago

Instigator

He helped the poor

Trent0405

Added: 1 year ago

Criterion

Pro

Tie

Con

Points

Better arguments

3 point(s)

Better sources

2 point(s)

Better spelling and grammar

1 point(s)

Better conduct

1 point(s)

Reason:

Neither side made a convincing argument.

Pro R1- Huey was for the common folk(unsubstantiated).

Con R1-states his confusion with the resolution.

Pro R2- FDR was good for America, Huey would've done more

Con R2- Forfeiture, CONDUCT to Pro as a result.

Pro R3-Nothing worth noting.

Con R3- America did fine without Huey.

Pro/Con R4- No noteworthy points.

Neither side went deep into why Huey was or wasn't needed, both sides best arguments would be okay if they gave me a sufficient evidence to back up their claims, e.g break down why Huey would've done more than FDR, or why/how he would make the polices irreversible.
It's only the forfeiture that implores me to vote Pro.