Total debates: 559
Vote for who made better argument for their political philosophy. Criteria to Consider: Understanability Articulation Practicality Resources Usability Personal insight
I believe that Socialism is the better form of economics and governance.
Aid to Israel shouldn’t occur until there is a ceasefire. This is not a question about October 7th being evil.
I will argue against a carbon tax, while you While you argue for a carbon tax. a carbon tax is a tax on things that use carbon. It is in an attempt to stop climate change.
The system of distribution at hand is clearly broken. Its about time we cleanly articulated how and why. The crux of this issuing being the means by which we product and distribute the wealth of out society. I for one believe this should be to each according to his contribution and need. But lets hear a compelling arguement exploiting the labour force.
I want to see the arguments for the continuing of Capitalism as a global economic system as well as a case against alternative systems like Socialism.
I will debate that religion and the concept of god is a net positive for the world, while my opponent will argue against.
A thought on a possible new form of governing.
No description has been provided
Transgender women have the right to be acknowledged on a societal level however, it must also be acknowledged that they are not biologically female and thus, should not feel entitled to women's-only spaces - that is, bathrooms, sports categories, et cetera. They should not appear in adverts targeted towards women, whether that be advertising clothing or sanitary products.
Should prostitution be legal? To be taken by those who consider themselves and vote right wing (conservative or republican) If you take this debate it will be assumed that you agree with most of the political views of the right.
all gun control is unconstitutional. If you want to ban tanks, jets, or grenades, a constitutional amendment is needed.
European colonizers didn't "steal" the land of the natives'
The federal minimum wage should be lowered
The debate is about *the desire* that drives the legislation to come into effect, *not the reason* for it to come into effect. i.e. the motive behind the introduction of legislation. Please note in this regard by "desire" I mean the mission (an ambition or purpose that is assumed by a person or group) of NGOs (non-governmental organisations) who lobby for the introduction of such legislation via the creation thereof by a governmental authority.
No description has been provided
Gun laws should be less strict and self defense laws looser. Politicians advocating against gun rights shouldn’t be protected with guns bought by the taxpayers they are trying to disarm. Gun rights stem out to many other issues like crime and personal freedom. The founding fathers would be horrified at where we are today and why there are so many laws attacking well-meaning citizens and letting criminals run free on the streets.
Throughout the debate, Pro and Con will discuss scientific evidence, philosophical principles, and societal considerations.
https://www.enotes.com/topics/farewell-address
the focus squarely lies on the 37 criminal charges brought against former President Donald Trump, with the exclusion of potential election fraud charges. Debaters will be vying to prove that the existing evidence is substantial and compelling.
The US doesn’t represent global freedom or democracy, despite what it says
This debate is inspired by a recent tweet from U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken. Tweet Link: https://twitter.com/SecBlinken/status/1679860760145543169
In short, taxes.
By request from CON.
Taking into consideration the unique lens of government, should abortion be supported or not. Pro argues government should support abortion, Con argues that abortion should not be supported by the government.
The United States has, in recent years, drifted towards more leftist, liberal, stances on issues. Pro argues that the political and social shift is destroying the strength of the country. Con is arguing otherwise.
Resolution: It should not be possible to ban or remove books from school libraries based on parents' or guardians' objections to the content.
The burden of proof is on both the Pro and Con, Con must prove Trump is innocent and the Pro must prove his responsibility and or guilt.
In general I find absurd the war on pacifists going on right now, especially in my country (Italy) but also abroad. As a citinzen of a nation that has been fueling the conflict for over a year I debate that the only one who should be targeded are those who want a military resolution of the conflict.
Researching history is pretty hard if you don't have a public and unrestricted website.
On balance, Capitalism is less altruistic than Communism.
If choosing between the two, voters should pick Ron DeSantis over Joe Biden.
BOP is mutual. I must demonstrate that there is clear evidence that the political engine is attempting to limit speech. Con must successfully refute my claims, and demonstrate my claim is not supported. I must refute Con's claims. A Draw is possible. one forfeit = loss.
No description has been provided
Donald Trump committed criminal offences whilst president of the United States.
The US claims to be a democracy. I contest that notion. Be factual, and use references. Ad hominems are an immediate forfeit of the debate. I genuinely hope I am voted against on merits.
Sham- Something that is not what it purports to be; a spurious imitation.
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
Uganda recently passed an anti gay bill. It's is definitely drastic but I do believe it is necessary.
Abortion. Do I need to explain?
There is a great misunderstanding of America's first Amendment compared to other nations' understanding of Freedom of speech. the rules of the debate are as follows Pro must establish Freedom of speech has no limits as well as justify why this should remain the case. Con has to either prove that freedom of speech is in fact limited or give a strong argument as to why it should be limited even if it is not the case at present.
I think that the Ukraine war is not an unprovoked attack, and the West is the major contributor to the commencement and sustainment of hostilities. West means NATO, and individual countries acting independently from NATO.
On balance, the Command Economy is superior to the Market Economy.
Resolution: Islam Does Not Encourage Authoritarianism (Pro) – Does Encourage Authoritarianism (Con)
Let's debate about the Wrongs of Capitalism!
The burden of proof in this debate is shared. Pro will attempt to prove that the police do more good than harm, and Con will attempt to prove that the police do more harm than good.