Total debates: 580
This debate aims to look at which candidate would serve the United States better as president.
No description has been provided
Universal basic income (UBI) is the concept of a government program in which every adult citizen receives a set amount of money regularly.
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
In this debate, we will discuss whether Russian President Vladimir Putin is a war criminal or not.
*Read Full Description Carefully* PRO's claim: "Every trans woman is a woman." CON's claim: "No trans woman is a woman" or "Some trans women are not women."
The system of distribution at hand is clearly broken. Its about time we cleanly articulated how and why. The crux of this issuing being the means by which we product and distribute the wealth of out society. I for one believe this should be to each according to his contribution and need. But lets hear a compelling arguement exploiting the labour force.
No description has been provided
If you accept this debate, you will argue that Donald Trump's rhetoric towards immigration would be beneficial to the Economy if he were president, and he enacted those policies.
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
This debate will be over abortion and whether or not it should remain legal. The debate will take place over a matter of three rounds, with three days each to make an argument. The voting will then take place over a two week period to decide the victor.
If choosing between the two, voters should pick Ron DeSantis over Joe Biden.
I am looking to have a discussion/debate with someone who does not believe racism affects the United States today.
Aid to Israel shouldn’t occur until there is a ceasefire. This is not a question about October 7th being evil.
Just curious to see what people thing, I can see both sides :)
Vote for who made better argument for their political philosophy. Criteria to Consider: Understanability Articulation Practicality Resources Usability Personal insight
I believe that Socialism is the better form of economics and governance.
I will argue against a carbon tax, while you While you argue for a carbon tax. a carbon tax is a tax on things that use carbon. It is in an attempt to stop climate change.
I want to see the arguments for the continuing of Capitalism as a global economic system as well as a case against alternative systems like Socialism.
I will debate that religion and the concept of god is a net positive for the world, while my opponent will argue against.
A thought on a possible new form of governing.
No description has been provided
Transgender women have the right to be acknowledged on a societal level however, it must also be acknowledged that they are not biologically female and thus, should not feel entitled to women's-only spaces - that is, bathrooms, sports categories, et cetera. They should not appear in adverts targeted towards women, whether that be advertising clothing or sanitary products.
Should prostitution be legal? To be taken by those who consider themselves and vote right wing (conservative or republican) If you take this debate it will be assumed that you agree with most of the political views of the right.
all gun control is unconstitutional. If you want to ban tanks, jets, or grenades, a constitutional amendment is needed.
European colonizers didn't "steal" the land of the natives'
The federal minimum wage should be lowered
The debate is about *the desire* that drives the legislation to come into effect, *not the reason* for it to come into effect. i.e. the motive behind the introduction of legislation. Please note in this regard by "desire" I mean the mission (an ambition or purpose that is assumed by a person or group) of NGOs (non-governmental organisations) who lobby for the introduction of such legislation via the creation thereof by a governmental authority.
No description has been provided
Gun laws should be less strict and self defense laws looser. Politicians advocating against gun rights shouldn’t be protected with guns bought by the taxpayers they are trying to disarm. Gun rights stem out to many other issues like crime and personal freedom. The founding fathers would be horrified at where we are today and why there are so many laws attacking well-meaning citizens and letting criminals run free on the streets.
Throughout the debate, Pro and Con will discuss scientific evidence, philosophical principles, and societal considerations.
https://www.enotes.com/topics/farewell-address
the focus squarely lies on the 37 criminal charges brought against former President Donald Trump, with the exclusion of potential election fraud charges. Debaters will be vying to prove that the existing evidence is substantial and compelling.
The US doesn’t represent global freedom or democracy, despite what it says
This debate is inspired by a recent tweet from U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken. Tweet Link: https://twitter.com/SecBlinken/status/1679860760145543169
In short, taxes.
By request from CON.
Taking into consideration the unique lens of government, should abortion be supported or not. Pro argues government should support abortion, Con argues that abortion should not be supported by the government.