Huey Long was what American really needed at his time
All stages have been completed. The voting points distribution and the result are presented below.
With 1 vote and 1 point ahead, the winner is ...
- Publication date
- Last update date
- Time for argument
- Three days
- Voting system
- Open voting
- Voting period
- One week
- Point system
- Four points
- Rating mode
- Characters per argument
- Required rating
Huey Long was what the Nation needed at the time https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nMUx4AQl5tI he was authoritarian but was not brutal and helped the poor and he was planning to stop communism, he wanted something else between capitalism and communism
Neither side made a convincing argument.
Pro R1- Huey was for the common folk(unsubstantiated).
Con R1-states his confusion with the resolution.
Pro R2- FDR was good for America, Huey would've done more
Con R2- Forfeiture, CONDUCT to Pro as a result.
Pro R3-Nothing worth noting.
Con R3- America did fine without Huey.
Pro/Con R4- No noteworthy points.
Neither side went deep into why Huey was or wasn't needed, both sides best arguments would be okay if they gave me a sufficient evidence to back up their claims, e.g break down why Huey would've done more than FDR, or why/how he would make the polices irreversible.
It's only the forfeiture that implores me to vote Pro.