Instigator / Con
0
1488
rating
4
debates
37.5%
won
Topic

Junk Food Tax

Status
Finished

All stages have been completed. The voting points distribution and the result are presented below.

Arguments points
0
12
Sources points
0
8
Spelling and grammar points
0
4
Conduct points
0
4

With 4 votes and 28 points ahead, the winner is ...

oromagi
Parameters
More details
Publication date
Last update date
Category
Health
Time for argument
Two days
Voting system
Open voting
Voting period
Two weeks
Point system
Four points
Rating mode
Rated
Characters per argument
10,000
Contender / Pro
28
1929
rating
99
debates
98.99%
won
Description
~ 463 / 5,000

This debate is about if a Junk Food Tax should be implemented in the current United States of America. To prove this, Pro must prove that it is beneficial, and overall positive to society, and Con has to disprove or refute the benefits, and add points on why it is bad, or harmful to society.

Rules:
1. No trolling, forfeiting, or insulting (in a serious degree). If this rule is broken, it warrants an automatic loss.

2. I waive first round you waive last.

Added:
Criterion
Con
Tie
Pro
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better spelling and grammar
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Full forfeit.

Added:
Criterion
Con
Tie
Pro
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better spelling and grammar
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

FF

Added:
Criterion
Con
Tie
Pro
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better spelling and grammar
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

FF

Added:
Criterion
Con
Tie
Pro
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better spelling and grammar
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

FF