Instigator / Pro
20
1266
rating
119
debates
15.97%
won
Topic
#177
Dogs and cats should be on a raw meat diet
Status
Finished
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
Winner & statistics
After 5 votes and with 15 points ahead, the winner is...
warren42
Parameters
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 3
- Time for argument
- Three days
- Max argument characters
- 30,000
- Voting period
- One week
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
- Open
Contender / Con
35
1496
rating
2
debates
50.0%
won
Description
No information
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:
Pro never provided an argument and failed to even make an appearance.
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:
Full forfeit.
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:
Full FF by Pro. By not forwarding an argument, he didn't meet his Burden of Proof.
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:
Full forfeiture by Pro. However, even though Con more or less saw the debate through, neither side presented an argument. Because of this, sources were not used by either party, and spelling and grammar is therefore non applicable. Con was polite and displayed overall etiquette because he honored his commitment to the discussion.
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:
Full Forfeit by Pro.
*******************************************************************
>Reported Vote: Ramshutu // Mod action: Not Removed
>Points Awarded: 7 points to Con
>Reason for Decision: Full forfeit
>Reason for Mod Action: Full forfeit debates are not moderated unless they vote for the forfeiting side, which they did not do.
************************************************************************
*******************************************************************
>Reported Vote: Armoredcat // Mod action: Not Removed
>Points Awarded: 3 points to Con for arguments
>Reason for Decision: Full FF by Pro. By not forwarding an argument, he didn't meet his Burden of Proof.
>Reason for Mod Action: This debate is a full forfeit. FF debates are not moderated unless the voter voted for the conceding side. This did not occur, so this vote is not actionable.
************************************************************************
*******************************************************************
>Reported Vote: RationalMadman // Mod action: Not Removed
>Points Awarded: 3 points to Con for arguments
>Reason for Decision: Full Forfeit by Pro.
>Reason for Mod Action: This debate is a full forfeit. FF debates are not moderated unless the voter voted for the conceding side. This did not occur, so this vote is not actionable.
************************************************************************
*******************************************************************
>Reported Vote: Argent_Tongue // Mod action: Not Removed
>Points Awarded: 1 point to Con for conduct
>Reason for Decision: Full forfeiture by Pro. However, even though Con more or less saw the debate through, neither side presented an argument. Because of this, sources were not used by either party, and spelling and grammar is therefore non applicable. Con was polite and displayed overall etiquette because he honored his commitment to the discussion.
>Reason for Mod Action: This debate is a full forfeit. FF debates are not moderated unless the voter voted for the conceding side. This did not occur, so this vote is not actionable.
************************************************************************