Instigator / Pro
2
1488
rating
1
debates
0.0%
won
Topic
#2067

The more homework your students have, the better.

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Better arguments
0
9
Better sources
2
6
Better legibility
0
3
Better conduct
0
3

After 3 votes and with 19 points ahead, the winner is...

RationalMadman
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
2
Time for argument
Two days
Max argument characters
10,000
Voting period
One week
Point system
Multiple criterions
Voting system
Open
Contender / Con
21
1697
rating
556
debates
68.17%
won
Description

No information

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Argument: Con offered the only argument, and it is appreciated all the more by cunning use of germane cynicism in the 2nd round.

Sourcing: How does one apply negative points. Although Con offered the only argument, there was no sourcing, when, at least, the last paragraph of Con's round 1 begged for a source for the stated percentages of the factors noted. Pro offered no argument at all, meaning no sourcing. I'm not sure which is the more grievous approach.

S&G: To Con

Conduct: To Con. Full forfeit by Pro.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Con is the only one who provided any argument.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Full Forfeit.