Online Debate
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
After 14 votes and with 88 points ahead, the winner is...
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 5
- Time for argument
- Two days
- Max argument characters
- 500
- Voting period
- Two months
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
- Open
Panuto: Magkakaroon ng debate ang mga mag-aaral. Sa isang panig ang mga nagsasabi na pantay-pantay ang lahat ng tao, sa kabila naman ang mga naniniwala na hindi pantay-pantay ang mga tao.
full forfeited
FF by pro and oromagi had better arguments
pro forfeited the majority of the debate
░░░░░░███████ ]▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ Bob is building an army.
▂▄▅█████████▅▄▃▂ ☻/ This tank & Bob are against forfeits
Il███████████████████]. /▌ Copy and Paste this all over
◥⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙◤.. / \ dart if you are with us
Full Forfeit
what in the world
FF
Gimme them medals
this is rfd
Full forfiet.
Argument: Félicitations à Concurrent pour cinq tours complets d’arguments. Provacateur forfait. Points vers Conurrent.
Sources: Provacateur n’en avait pas. Concurrent: François-Marie Arouet [aussi connu sous les noms, Voltaire et Zozo] Points ver Concurrent
Epellation et grammaire: Point vers Concurrent
Coduite: Provacateur n’en avait pas, et forfait le débat. Point vers Concurrent
Panuto: Magkakaroon ng debate ang mga mag-aaral. Sa isang panig ang mga nagsasabi na pantay-pantay ang lahat ng tao, sa kabila naman ang mga naniniwala na hindi pantay-pantay ang mga tao Fateful Falafel
Forfeiture
Panuto: Magkakaroon ng debate ang mga mag-aaral. Sa isang panig ang mga nagsasabi na pantay-pantay ang lahat ng tao, sa kabila naman ang mga naniniwala na hindi pantay-pantay ang mga tao.
Forfeiture.
Arg and Sources: CON is the only one that uses them
S & G: CON actually use English. PRO used foreign languages would mean it would be hard to understand on an English website.
Conduct: PRO forfeited. CON gets the point.
Ppl still voting on this? Why?
Just realized I made all points tied. Had to delete and redo.
thank u, intelligence
R4 SOURCES:
https://history.hanover.edu/texts/voltaire/volequal.html
https://www.google.com/search?q=english+to+tagalog&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8
R3 SOURCES:
https://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/
https://quotefancy.com/quote/857197/Mahatma-Gandhi-No-two-leaves-were-alike-and-yet-there-is-no-antagonism-between-them-or
https://www.google.com/search?q=english+to+tagalog&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8
There are lots of one-time debaters where they quickly create one then go away. They constitute 50% of my total win in my old account.
R2 SOURCES:
https://www.google.com/search?q=english+to+tagalog&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8
https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/declaration-transcript
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frances_Wright
Well Oro is known to play semantics, so he probably thinks that a post not in english is one equal of nothing.
Yeah I thought so too.
I thought you are supposed to prove that people aren't equal
R1 SOURCES:
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/online
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/debate
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burden_of_proof_%28philosophy%29
Hi, El-Khe. I see this is your first debate but I think you will probably want a chance to refine your formatting. I've translated your description from Tagalog:
Rule: Students will have a debate. On the one hand those who say that everyone is equal, while others believe that people are not equal.
Which certainly sounds like an interesting and debatable topic. I would recommend that you write the debate topic in English and set some expectations for what kind of debate you are looking for in the description. I recommend that we delete this debate so you can restart without penalty