Instigator / Pro

1500

rating

debates

100.0%

won

Topic

#239

What is the best Clash Royale card

Status

Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics

Better arguments

Better sources

Better legibility

Better conduct

After 1 vote and with 3 points ahead, the winner is...

thebosslegend

Judges

Username

9 debates / 135 votes

Voted

Tags

Games

Parameters

Publication date: 10.30.2018 08:47PM
Last updated date: 11.06.2018 05:21PM
Type: Standard
Number of rounds: 4
Time for argument: One day
Max argument characters: 30,000
Voting period: Two weeks
Point system: Multiple criterions
Voting system: Judges

Contender / Con

That-one-Noob

1500

rating

debates

50.0%

won

Description

vyfgvhftdrcfygufyjgv

Round 1

thebosslegend

10.31.2018 08:47PM

Pro

Forfeited

That-one-Noob

11.01.2018 08:47PM

Con

Forfeited

Round 2

thebosslegend

11.02.2018 02:12AM

Pro

The best card in clash royale is the Pekka the Pekka has a strong attack an can do as much as 800 damage. This means the Pekka can take a tower in just about 3 swings. The Pekka has many hitpoints and can survive practically any card. The Pekka not only is good by itself but it can also be used as a meat shield for other troops such as a wizard or so. Not only is a Pekka good on attack it is also amazing on defense. The Pekka can shred through many other troops such as wizards e barbs, prince, and golem.

That-one-Noob

11.03.2018 02:12AM

Con

Forfeited

Round 3

thebosslegend

11.04.2018 02:12AM

Pro

Forfeited

That-one-Noob

11.05.2018 02:12AM

Con

Forfeited

Round 4

thebosslegend

11.06.2018 02:12AM

Pro

Forfeited

That-one-Noob

11.06.2018 04:42PM

Con

I think the best card in the game is inferno tower. This is because it can take out almost any tank with the help of a couple spam cards. This card takes out any tank in the game. It can also pull units over to a side of field so that both towers also are targeted on the troop it is pulling. The tank will die in, at most, 6 seconds. After the tank is dead the support unit will die too because it is still targeted on the inferno tower. Most tank pushes are at least 12 elixir. Inferno tower is only 5 elixir. This leaves you with more elixir to counter push then what they have for defense. One of the tanks inferno tower kills is Pekka. Which my opponent has used as the best card. Pekka can be countered easily with inferno tower. This means that Pekka isn't really a very good card if it can be countered by just a 5 elixir card.

Username

11.06.2018 05:21PM

Criterion

Pro

Tie

Con

Points

Better arguments

3 point(s)

Better sources

2 point(s)

Better legibility

1 point(s)

Better conduct

1 point(s)

Reason:

Arguments: Pro presents arguments about Pekka having a strong attack damage, good defense, and Pekkas' ability to be used as a meat shield. Con only somewhat rebuttals one of these arguments about Pekkas' ability to defend by showing that the Inferno Tower can kill it in one hit, but drops the rest. Con's arguments on the Inferno Tower concern it's attack damage, ability to move units to the side of the field, and it's elixir cost. These arguments cannot be addressed by Pro because Con posted new arguments in the last round, which I will go more into detail about in the conduct point. But overall, since Con drops most of Pro's arguments, Pro fulfills his Burden of Proof and thus wins the argument point.

Sources: Neither side used sources, so this is not applicable.

Spelling and Grammar: Both had some comma mistakes which did not detract from the debates' readability, but I'll give the edge to Con here because Pro has several bizarre sentences which detract from the readability of the debate such as:

"can also be used as a meat shield for other troops such as a wizard or so."

Conduct: Since both sides forfeited an equal amount of times, no conduct points can be addressed there, but Pro overall has better conduct because Con posts new arguments in the final round which Pro cannot rebut, which is generally considered poor conduct.

All things considered, this debate is a win for Pro.