vivian and quinns top secret debate
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
After 6 votes and with 19 points ahead, the winner is...
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 2
- Time for argument
- Two days
- Max argument characters
- 10,000
- Voting period
- One month
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
- Open
No information
Arguments: Con rhymed, and I didn't get their argument.
Conduct: Con forfeited, whereas Pro didn't.
Essentially an FF from Con, if you forfeit all rounds after round 1 it's officially FF and Con's R1 was some irrelavant poem/song that verges on plagiarism.
Nothing was achieved.
Pro has an argument without the specification fo a topic agreed upon beforehand, so it would mean virtually nothing.
Con’s “argument” was a poem and it argued nothing against Pro’s anything.
No evidence, adequate presentation, with one of the two insulting and the other forfeiting. This is the most disappointing thing I have seen all day.
Argument - Pro made some pretty good arguments regarding how she would kick his ass and Con made no rebuttals and merely presented a pretty good poem which was nothing to do with Pros argument. Con also made no claims that the debate was not about who would kick the others ass in a fight, so that was pretty poor, meaning the argument must go to Pro - Pro
Sources - Neither produced sources - Tie
S&G - Both appear as literate as eachother - Tie
Conduct - One forfeited, the other called the other a fool, which means one violation each - Tie
Argument: The resolution is quite hard to interpret, but based on Pro's first argument it seems to be some sort of "who would win in a fight" situation. While none of Pro's arguments are consideredly sequitur or substantiated - Con doesn't actually present an argument. So Pro does win the arguments, by default.
Conduct: Pro is being penalized as an entire round is an insult to their opponent.
Con presented a poem about castaways, seemingly unrelated to Pro's argument.
I was swayed by his poem
I think Quinn may win this