Instigator / Con

Crocodile

1436

rating

debates

38.64%

won

Topic

#3300

Crocodile is younger than 13 years of age!

Status

Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics

Better arguments

Better sources

Better legibility

Better conduct

After 4 votes and with 28 points ahead, the winner is...

Crocodile

Tags

Economics

Parameters

Publication date: 01.18.2022 06:00PM
Last updated date: 01.26.2022 06:03PM
Type: Standard
Number of rounds: 1
Time for argument: One day
Max argument characters: 150
Voting period: One week
Point system: Multiple criterions
Voting system: Open

Contender / Pro

WaterPhoenix

1512

rating

debates

54.17%

won

Description

Years of Age > Legal YOA
Crocodile > The user is the con position, me, myself, and I!

Round 1

Crocodile

01.18.2022 06:03PM

Con

Simple argument, I am not banned because I am older than 13. Also, I say I am older than 13, and any probes to get evidence to disprove this is doxxing

WaterPhoenix

01.19.2022 06:03PM

Pro

Forfeited

Crocodile

01.22.2022 06:47PM

lmao

Barney

01.22.2022 04:35AM

-->

@RationalMadman

Certainly hard to call it a real debate. That said, jumping to negative conclusions about the intent without any pattern, seems overly hasty.

Mharman

01.20.2022 03:05AM

Wut

RationalMadman

01.19.2022 01:31PM

-->

@Barney

@whiteflame

this is wintrading.

Crocodile

01.19.2022 12:38PM

balls

ILikePie5

01.22.2022 10:38PM

Criterion

Con

Tie

Pro

Points

Better arguments

3 point(s)

Better sources

2 point(s)

Better legibility

1 point(s)

Better conduct

1 point(s)

Reason:

Full forfeit

Ramshutu

01.21.2022 06:24PM

Criterion

Con

Tie

Pro

Points

Better arguments

3 point(s)

Better sources

2 point(s)

Better legibility

1 point(s)

Better conduct

1 point(s)

Reason:

Full forfeit

ComputerNerd

01.20.2022 04:37AM

Criterion

Con

Tie

Pro

Points

Better arguments

3 point(s)

Better sources

2 point(s)

Better legibility

1 point(s)

Better conduct

1 point(s)

Reason:

You're just doing a short debate with a limit of 150 characters for only 1 round each.

If you do this again, I would recommend making it unrated, because this type of debate lacks effort, and is just unfair.

RationalMadman

01.19.2022 06:30PM

Criterion

Con

Tie

Pro

Points

Better arguments

3 point(s)

Better sources

2 point(s)

Better legibility

1 point(s)

Better conduct

1 point(s)

Reason:

If you do more of this wintrading stuff, I will report to the mods because I got legitimate debates where I defeated Type1 on an alt removed due to alleged wintrading.