Instigator / Pro
0
1462
rating
21
debates
28.57%
won
Topic

(Mini debate)We should fully embrace thorium nuclear energy

Status
Finished

All stages have been completed. The voting points distribution and the result are presented below.

Arguments points
0
12
Sources points
0
8
Spelling and grammar points
0
4
Conduct points
0
4

With 4 votes and 28 points ahead, the winner is ...

Kritikal
Parameters
More details
Publication date
Last update date
Category
Science
Time for argument
Two hours
Voting system
Open voting
Voting period
One week
Point system
Four points
Rating mode
Rated
Characters per argument
10,000
Contender / Con
28
1545
rating
4
debates
87.5%
won
Description
~ 144 / 5,000

Pro:

* Has to defend the idea that thorium is the future nuclear energy.

Con:

* Has to state why thorium isn't the future of nuclear energy.

Added:
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better spelling and grammar
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Forfeit debate.

Added:
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better spelling and grammar
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Interesting topic but full forfeit

Added:
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better spelling and grammar
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Forfeit debate.

Added:
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better spelling and grammar
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Full forfeit