Total debates: 186
Is the Holy Spirit of God's supernatural revelation, whereby a man may know and understand the veracity of His word in the Holy Scriptures (66 books of the Bible), sufficiently valid as a scientific means of substantiating the truth of God's word in the Holy Scriptures?
IID = It Is Debated. Pretty straightforward. Abortion is murder.
Fossil fuels should be banned.
The actual risks of Global Warming have been exaggerated and dramatized by politicians and environmentalists.
No description has been provided
Current evidence about Global Warming/Climate Change is misleading and too simplistic to accurately determine the cause. The fears of climate scientists and environmentalists are irrational.
Politicians fabricated Global Warming to sell us electric cars, thereby allowing them to tax us so we have to pay more for their expensive policies. I have studied this subject more now, so I can debunk anyone claiming Global Warming is real.
We need Elon to tax them to get to Mars.
From a medical standpoint, science has shown vaccines to be unreliable and cause long-term damage. Society has a moral obligation to get rid of vaccines and opt for natural cures instead.
There is no way humans came from monkeys!! Evolution is a hoax and Charles Darwin is a conspiracy theorist.
No description has been provided
Gender Affirming Therapy Is Dangerous
No description has been provided
dont come with weak arguments , this property that property like... dopamine strike to the wall ! seeking scientific factual debate !
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
Theoretical concepts of an existence which is not the 3rd dimension are only possible "theoretically".
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
I am going to argue that "most" contemporary mainstream scientists believe personhood begins at the point of fertilization
ID vs macroevolution
This is a mini debate about using thorium as nuclear energy
The choice to transition is often described as being unnatural. My position is that it is not. The con position would be that it is unnatural.
No description has been provided
A debate on the existence of the multiverse
No description has been provided
There is no proof any race is superior to another.
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
In this debate I shall project my own mental shortcomings onto the alleged "genius," Albert Einstein, who sadly passed away in 1955. This is very convenient, since it means he cannot defend himself against my accusations.
Resolution: Women are psychologically better suited than Men to raise and care for children .
This is for Lunatic’s February Debate Tournament (https://www.debateart.com/forum/topics/7273-february-debate-tournament), round 1.
definitions: good: correct in most cases to determine whether or not someone has a characteristic. intelligence: high ability to solve problems. rules: 1. stick to the definitions. 2. The burden of proof is shared.
Psychology & Psychiatry are bunk.
????????????????????????????????????????????enter?????????????
Another in the series
With regards to the origin of COVID-19, was it bats or was it incompetence?
PRO=MOON colony first CON=MARS colony first
burger king
Scientific sci-fi or sci-sci-fi, call it what you want.
No description has been provided