Instigator / Pro
2
1266
rating
119
debates
15.97%
won
Topic
#35

9/11 was an inside job

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Better arguments
0
6
Better sources
0
4
Better legibility
2
2
Better conduct
0
2

After 2 votes and with 12 points ahead, the winner is...

Earth
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
3
Time for argument
One day
Max argument characters
30,000
Voting period
One week
Point system
Multiple criterions
Voting system
Open
Contender / Con
14
1543
rating
4
debates
100.0%
won
Description

No information

-->
@RationalMadman

Why would they isolate us out of the gajillion people who talk about 9/11 on the internet.

-->
@RationalMadman

They will not.

I have my reasons and I will not vote on this debate. I am just saying I will read it in detail but I will not say who I think won or why. This is a real thing they will detain you over.

I will not speak more about this one event tbph ever on the Internet and luckily I never did that in any public way did I focus on it.

I can admit I think it was an inside job but I will never ever prove it. I do nto want to imagine what can happen to Pro here or people like him if they prove it well enough.

-->
@RationalMadman

Its not a journalist. I even link where Pro got his round from.

For reasons of personal safety I will not be voting on this debate.

I have strong feeling Pro is correct but I will not say definitely.

Pro, which journalist are you using?

-->
@Castin

Tough bananas buddy. The spelling and grammar aren't even mine and on top of that the spelling and grammar is pretty much flawless, so if you want to vote against me just because you can't read then that just makes you gay.

-->
@Earth

I don't know if you can edit an argument once it's posted on this site.

-->
@Type1

Srsly Type1, those walls of text are just handing your opponent the grammar and spelling point.

-->
@Type1

Can you fix them?

-->
@Earth

I just checked, only a couple are broken. The first one doesn't work because the A at the end isn't supposed to be part of the link.

-->
@Type1

Your links are broken