Instigator / Pro
18
1500
rating
1
debates
50.0%
won
Topic
#3574
Does God exist ? Which religion is the truth ?
Status
Finished
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
Winner & statistics
After 4 votes and with the same amount of points on both sides...
It's a tie!
Parameters
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 2
- Time for argument
- Two days
- Max argument characters
- 10,000
- Voting period
- One month
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
- Open
Contender / Con
18
1500
rating
1
debates
50.0%
won
Description
We do not want offending people; we are here to discuss and nothing but to discuss
Round 1
MONOTHEISM IS CLEARLY THE ULTIMATE TRUTH.
AS MUSLIM, IN QURAN, IT DOES NOT SAY THAT ISLAM IS A NEW RELIGION,
islam only means submitting will to God
So by this argument, Islam is not a NEW religion
MY THESIS IS : Islam is only the last message, the old and new testament are corrupt copies
from the original scriptures sent by Allah / YHWH ( God in general ) to specific people
QURAN IS FROM GOD
I lack belief in the abrahamic god because i have seen no convincing evidence
Round 2
THE EVIDENCE IS THAT QURAN IS DIVNE, QURAN IS FROM GOD
QURAN CONTAINS SIGNS, AND EVEN WITHOUT TALKING ABOUT QURAN
IF WE REFLECT, WE SEE THAT ACCORDING TO Occam's RAZOR and
Aristotle's first argument, there should be a first mover
AT LEAST YOU AGREE THAT THE UNIVERSE CANNOT COME FROM NOTHING ?
Forfeited
Given the recently released photos from the super telescopes...it is clear things can come from nothing (which truly isn't nothing), per se, as there are certainly some things out there resulting in the vast number of stars, suns, planets and wonderous galaxies.
How is the second part of the debate topic assuming Con is atheist? Con can simply argue their own religion they believe if they truly think its the most truthful one.
"Which religion is truth"
The first part of the topic statement assumes that the opposing faction is atheist, so either the second part should be dropped or this claim is unprovable or unfalsifiable, which is unfit for a topic. Just a suggestion, dropping the second part of the topic would arguably make a better topic.