Instigator / Pro
2
1465
rating
10
debates
25.0%
won
Topic
#3595

Dogs are better pets than cats.

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Better arguments
0
3
Better sources
0
2
Better legibility
1
1
Better conduct
1
1

After 1 vote and with 5 points ahead, the winner is...

Novice_II
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
2
Time for argument
Two days
Max argument characters
10,000
Voting period
Two weeks
Point system
Multiple criterions
Voting system
Open
Contender / Con
7
1890
rating
98
debates
93.37%
won
Description

No information

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Neg reads a turn saying it is easier to house train cats. This is also supported by a reliable biomedical source.

Then on 2-6 Neg says that it is speculative.

Protection is effectively conceded for Con when pro says:“Regardless, cats can be just as protective as dogs. You have not shown evidence of Dogs being more protective”

The debate essentially is over here when all of Negs offense goes dropped.

But even looking at the defensive arguments from Aff’s R2 it is clear that Neg was able to perform a comprehensive line by line, and that the defense itself is simply conjecture. Due to this Neg offense outweigh's Pro's.

As a side note Pro should also signpost and separate out contentions as this makes it much easier on judges and opponents to evaluate clash.