Instigator / Pro
0
1533
rating
18
debates
36.11%
won
Topic
#3668

Unrated: Censorship is evidence a person is wrong

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Better arguments
0
3
Better sources
0
2
Better legibility
0
1
Better conduct
0
1

After 1 vote and with 7 points ahead, the winner is...

Mall
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
3
Time for argument
Three days
Max argument characters
2,500
Voting period
One month
Point system
Multiple criterions
Voting system
Open
Contender / Con
7
1483
rating
327
debates
40.21%
won
Description

This is unrated because I want to set some standards on Con that can be deemed unfair, though given the flaws in my logic it shouldn't be too hard to overcome this.

Rules for con

1. You cannot make counter arguments. You are only allowed to address my premises and explain why they are either wrong or why my premises don't necessitate my conclusion being true.

The final round has new arguments from con

Mall actually played it clever. So clever actually.

-->
@PREZ-HILTON

xD! Enjoy vsing Mall, I genuinely don't know who will annoy who more.

I am willing to adjust the character count to what a person arguing con feels like they need. I thought 2500 would make it so I could keep this a low effort debate

-->
@PREZ-HILTON

I see the irony in the character count and rule for Con.

I see what you did.