Instigator / Pro
0
1483
rating
327
debates
40.21%
won
Topic
#3702

Biological reincarnation is real.

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Winner
0
1

After 1 vote and with 1 point ahead, the winner is...

Novice_II
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
3
Time for argument
One day
Max argument characters
19,999
Voting period
One month
Point system
Winner selection
Voting system
Open
Contender / Con
1
1890
rating
98
debates
93.37%
won
Description

Disclaimer : Regardless of the setup for voting win or lose, The aim of this interaction, Is for those that view it, Learn and or take away anything that will amount to any constructive value ultimately. So that counts as anything that'll cause one to reconsider an idea, Understand a subject better, Help build a greater wealth of knowledge getting closer to truth. When either of us has accomplished that with any individual here, That's who the victor of the debate becomes.

It's evident, it's true that the topic is correct. It's scientific as in realizing everything around us.

Even philosophically broached by Swami Satchidananda . Everything that is will be.

That's as far as I'll go in the description. If you're really sharp, you'll see the topic is fact and non-contestable .

*Looking for arguments against only biological reincarnation*

Round 1
Pro
#1
What is your argument for biological reincarnation?
Con
#2
x. Default to con
  • Pro bears the full burden of proof, and failure to uphold such alone is sufficient for a con victory. The definition of reincarnation itself informs us that it is a "philosophical or religious concept," so pro also holds the burden to prove that it is a biological one as well.
    • Con need not provide any argument of his own. 


Framework
  • Biological: of or relating to biology or to life and living processes
  • Reincarnation: reincarnation, also known as rebirth or transmigration, is the philosophical or religious concept that the non-physical essence of a living being begins a new life in a different physical form or body after biological death.
  • Real: having objective independent existence (b) not artificial, fraudulent, or illusory. 

Rebuttal(s)
  • Nothing to rebut, no argument from pro. He bears the entire burden of proof here. 

Round 2
Pro
#3
What is your argument for biological reincarnation?
Con
#4
x. Default to con
  • Extend.

Framework
  • Not objected to, and consequently accepted. 

Rebuttal(s)
  • Pro has not upheld his burden of proof. 

Round 3
Pro
#5
Let the record show that I have asked this question to this person several times. They will not answer .

This includes all the debate sessions with the same topic with the same individual. The person knows my points. 

The person simply will not answer the question. It appears there are other individuals that will debate reincarnation.

I'm asking for a refutation attempt at biological reincarnation. The person is aware of what that is because I explained it .

I'm not going to repeat myself to the same person. 

When they can answer that question, we can move on.
Con
#6
x. Default to con
  • Extend. Pro has not made a single argument for the resolution. 

Framework
  • Not objected to, and consequently accepted. 

Rebuttal(s)
  • Pro has not upheld his burden of proof.