Instigator / Pro
0
1476
rating
336
debates
40.77%
won
Topic
#3742

You pick the topic.

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Winner
0
2

After 2 votes and with 2 points ahead, the winner is...

Novice_II
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
2
Time for argument
Two days
Max argument characters
20,000
Voting period
One month
Point system
Winner selection
Voting system
Open
Contender / Con
2
1890
rating
98
debates
93.37%
won
Description

Disclaimer : Regardless of the setup for voting win or lose, The aim of this interaction, Is for those that view it, Learn and or take away anything that will amount to any constructive value ultimately. So that counts as anything that'll cause one to reconsider an idea, Understand a subject better, Help build a greater wealth of knowledge getting closer to truth. When either of us has accomplished that with any individual here, That's who the victor of the debate becomes.

Here's a chance for you to design the platform based on your topic selection.
We'll obviously have opposing sides.

Whatever topic you choose of course, it'll fit whichever side it falls on for you in tandem with the position preset .

***THE TOPICS CANNOT BE DUPLICATE. IT'S AN AUTOMATIC FORFEITING IF THR SAME TOPIC IS CHOSEN***

Questions and concerns, leave a comment or send a message.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Winner
1 point(s)
Reason:

Pro justified US defending itself against a Canada attack but since Con iterates that Canada is not attacking the US, we are left to favour Con.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Winner
1 point(s)
Reason:

PRO did not really argue anything except say America can declare war on Canada and not go to war. At least that was what I gathered. The debate wasn't whether American CAN declare war on Canada but that they SHOULD declare war on Canada.

CON, on the flipside, argued that they shouldn't because Canada has not done anything to the United States. While this assertion was not really strongly backed by anything other than a link showing Canada and America are close allies, it is at least on topic and following what CON was supposed to prove. So CON won the debate because he actually argued what he was supposed to argue.