Instigator / Con

shabdak2.718

1466

rating

debates

8.33%

won

Topic

#3747

consumerism : causing destruction

Status

Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics

Better arguments

Better sources

Better legibility

Better conduct

After 1 vote and with 3 points ahead, the winner is...

RationalMadman

Tags

People

Parameters

Publication date: 09.17.2022 09:13AM
Last updated date: 10.21.2022 10:04PM
Type: Standard
Number of rounds: 5
Time for argument: Two days
Max argument characters: 10,000
Voting period: One month
Point system: Multiple criterions
Voting system: Open

Contender / Pro

RationalMadman

1702

rating

574

debates

67.86%

won

Description

No information

Round 1

shabdak2.718

09.17.2022 03:49PM

Con

why consuming is not causing destruction ?

is love about emitting carbon ?

800 crore ?

meat consumption ?

RationalMadman

09.17.2022 03:51PM

Pro

It is and I support it.

Round 2

shabdak2.718

09.17.2022 04:31PM

Con

don`t seems clash in cause then .

about solution :

-mature humans needed - not rabbit kids

-if you are brave then and then only one child .

-max to max one child

- if second caused then huge economic penalty

-third jail

-there should be "parent license"

-very very huge taxes on meat or just don`t

RationalMadman

09.17.2022 05:03PM

Pro

-mature humans needed - not rabbit kids

Not necessarily needed, consumerism can occur with... wait what?

-if you are brave then and then only one child .

That makes little sense, you are saying 'if you are brave then and only then take the cautious route' essentially. Please revise this.

-max to max one child

Well... Er... 2 parents... 1 child... hmm... Are we trying to go extinct? Is that the mission? I see.

- if second caused then huge economic penalty

Oh! China style, eh? Do you know about the issue there when too many males were favoured?

-third jail

Good idea, parents in prison will raise the three children very well.

-there should be "parent license"

And if you get it, you can only have 1 child, excellent!

-very very huge taxes on meat or just don`t

But why tax it? My only child needs it!

Round 3

shabdak2.718

09.17.2022 05:26PM

Con

otherwise nothing is gonna change like jokes

RationalMadman

09.17.2022 05:50PM

Pro

NOTHING HAS TO CHANGE FOR PRO TO WIN

Round 4

shabdak2.718

09.19.2022 05:50PM

Con

Forfeited

RationalMadman

09.19.2022 07:04PM

Pro

I will fucking consume you.

Round 5

shabdak2.718

09.21.2022 07:04PM

Con

Forfeited

RationalMadman

09.21.2022 10:04PM

Pro

#10

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BJ3ZXpserc

shabdak2.718

09.17.2022 05:48PM

-->

@RationalMadman

https://youtu.be/GumRdEi1dA8

Ehyeh

09.22.2022 07:58PM

Criterion

Con

Tie

Pro

Points

Better arguments

3 point(s)

Better sources

2 point(s)

Better legibility

1 point(s)

Better conduct

1 point(s)

Reason:

Simply here to pad RM's record for next time i beat him i will attain such juicy gains.