Instigator / Con
0
1492
rating
335
debates
40.9%
won
Topic
#3788

You select the topic.

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Winner
0
1

After 1 vote and with 1 point ahead, the winner is...

Novice_II
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
3
Time for argument
Two days
Max argument characters
10,000
Voting period
One month
Point system
Winner selection
Voting system
Open
Contender / Pro
1
1890
rating
98
debates
93.37%
won
Description

Disclaimer : Regardless of the setup for voting win or lose, The aim of this interaction, Is for those that view it, Learn and or take away anything that will amount to any constructive value ultimately. So that counts as anything that'll cause one to reconsider an idea, Understand a subject better, Help build a greater wealth of knowledge getting closer to truth. When either of us has accomplished that with any individual here, That's who the victor of the debate becomes.

Here's a chance for you to design the platform based on your topic selection.
We'll obviously have opposing sides.

Whatever topic you choose of course, it'll fit whichever side it falls on for you in tandem with the position preset .

***THE TOPICS CANNOT BE DUPLICATE. IT'S AN AUTOMATIC FORFEITING IF THE SAME TOPIC IS CHOSEN***

Questions and concerns, leave a comment or send a message.

Round 1
Con
#1
What do you have this time?
Pro
#2
  • Let's try this: 
  • THBT LeBron James is, on balance,  a better basketball player than Michael Jordan. 

Round 2
Con
#3
What's the proof on that?
Pro
#4

LeBron is much more clutch than Jordan. When the two smelled blood and had a chance to eliminate their opponents, LeBron wins 1.6% more often. When their backs are against the wall, LeBron wins 16.7% more often. Jordan only improved slightly in a few categories when facing elimination.
  • Thus, my argument is that LeBron James, considering everything, is the player you would rather have on your team if you had to choose one. 

Round 3
Con
#5
If the two were to play one one one, would you choose the one that won regardless of the two to be on your team to be a winning team?

If you choose the one that loses because of their professional game statistics, would those stats explain why they lost that time or even in the games to come ?

See stats can't measure everything. 

Some individuals are just the greatest of all time in spite of losses.

So to reiterate to let it resonate.

If the two were to play one on one, would you choose the one that won regardless of the two?
Pro
#6
  • How exactly does this relate to my arguments? Extend. 
  • I have shown that, on balance, LeBron James is the better basketball player, I am not sure what con's hypothetical has to do with the resolution.