Instigator / Pro

Mall

1476

rating

336

debates

40.77%

won

Topic

#3876

I'm classified to be for the most disagreeable of debateart.com

Status

Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics

Winner

After 3 votes and with 3 points ahead, the winner is...

Novice_II

Tags

People

Parameters

Publication date: 11.09.2022 09:17PM
Last updated date: 12.15.2022 04:50PM
Type: Standard
Number of rounds: 4
Time for argument: Two days
Max argument characters: 24,000
Voting period: One month
Point system: Winner selection
Voting system: Open

Contender / Con

Novice_II

1890

rating

debates

93.37%

won

Description

Regardless of the setup for voting win or lose, The aim of this interaction, Is for those that view it, Learn and or take away anything that will amount to any constructive value ultimately. So that counts as anything that'll cause one to reconsider an idea, Understand a subject better, Help build a greater wealth of knowledge getting closer to truth. When either of us has accomplished that with any individual here, That's who the victor of the debate becomes.

Debateart.com , what I'm referring to is the community, those individuals that have participated in debates with yours truly.

Mostly of what I argued about has been disagreed with.

Now ironically, I don't believe anyone here will disagree with this. If such a person does, it backs up my position. If there is no disagreement here after, it backs up that person to be a no true Scotsman or intellectually dishonest.

With that , false information, no facts, no correctness, no validity, no sound solid ground.

Does this seem like a loaded proposition, perhaps a double edged, double dilemma with no way out?

Well if you think you're that good , so called good of a debater, the door is open for you .

Seasons greetings by the way, happy hunting and fair game, whatever.

Questions on clarity, send a comment or message.

Round 1

Mall

11.10.2022 02:09PM

Pro

Being that you opted in participating, I'll ask you this question.

Would you disagree according to your experience of debates with you and myself that you've found yourself mostly disagreeing?

We can look at this from the perspective of the site or yours. You should have firsthand evidence in favor of my case.

Would you disagree according to your experience?

Novice_II

11.12.2022 01:10PM

Con

Framework

Classified: arranged in classes or categories.
Disagreeable: not pleasant or enjoyable.

Really, pro needs to give the argument to the effect of "I'm classified to be for the most disagreeable of debateart.com."

We need, of course, the criteria for who is the least pleasant or enjoyable, and why Mall is "for," those people.

Round 2

Mall

11.12.2022 08:24PM

Pro

I don't know why you accept these debates and not answer questions.

Would you disagree according to your experience of debates with you and myself that you've found yourself mostly disagreeing?

Would you disagree according to your experience?

I mean this site stands as evidence so why not admit or concede?

You guys are scared to answer these questions that put you on the spot as it'll refute you. The topic says I'm in the classification, the most disagreeable.

So if you answer directly and say "yes, I disagree with you just about on everything and I have voters to back me up to support it", debate over .

I got you guys by the hook.

Novice_II

11.12.2022 09:14PM

Con

Framework

Not responded to.

Again, all pro needs to give the argument to the effect of "I'm classified to be for the most disagreeable of debateart.com."

We need, of course, the criteria for who is the least pleasant or enjoyable, and why Mall is "for," those people.

Round 3

Mall

11.13.2022 04:41PM

Pro

Answer my questions or forfeit.

Novice_II

11.13.2022 05:06PM

Con

Framework

Not responded to.

Again, all pro needs to give the argument to the effect of "I'm classified to be for the most disagreeable of debateart.com."

We need, of course, the criteria for who is the least pleasant or enjoyable, and why Mall is "for," those people.
The burden is on pro, and no arguments have been made.

Round 4

Mall

11.14.2022 03:35PM

Pro

There you have it folks.

As usual, nothing personal but this person and many alike refuse to answer questions that pretty much close the case.

The answers will refute their position altogether.

It happens in court.

Only here, I don't have a judge to place them in contempt of court and in jail.

The simple question is, do you mostly disagree with much I have to say in these debates?

You walked right into this one. You go through each one of these prior debates I've had with this person, there was a counter to just about every point that was DISAGREED with.

Not only that but with debates with other people and the votes support that. You're going to not vote where you don't agree just like with a political election.

You don't agree with the candidate's policies, they don't get the vote.

I bet outside of this on a comment section or somewhere, the person would of answered directly.

Why? They're not on the witness stand in court. They're not on record if they're outside of court and on an untapped communication line such as direct private messaging on this site.

The person knows, the voters know, those who have gone through much of my catalog on this site, I'm in the minority of views for agreement.

A small amount of agreement means a large amount in disagreement. I'm in that category. This topic is regarding nothing else, NOTHING ELSE , but that.

I shake my head.

Novice_II

11.15.2022 01:31PM

Con

Not a single argument has been made by pro who holds the burden of proof. Consider this a fall forfeit from Mall.

Mall

12.15.2022 04:50PM

So you all do agree with me but vote against me. Yes the truth comes outttt. What a riot.

SirAnonymous

11.22.2022 06:27PM

-->

@Mall

I think you meant "among the most disagreeable" and not "for the most disagreeable." That one word makes a significant difference to the meaning of the resolution.

Mall

11.14.2022 03:35PM

Hope all is clear. Smh .

K_Michael

11.10.2022 07:42PM

-->

@Mall

That is possibly the least legible claim I have ever seen.
Do you mean you have the most disagreed with beliefs of anyone on DART? Because I certainly disagree with your grammar.

K_Michael

11.23.2022 02:25AM

Criterion

Pro

Tie

Con

Points

Winner

1 point(s)

Reason:

By making the positive claim, Pro assumes the BoP. He incorrectly asserts that Con must make an argument against or forfeit, but fails to provide any himself.
Point to Con

SirAnonymous

11.22.2022 06:30PM

Criterion

Pro

Tie

Con

Points

Winner

1 point(s)

Reason:

Con correctly pointed out that Pro had the BOP to show that he was "for the most disagreeable." Pro never provided any evidence to support that, so Con wins.

Vici

11.21.2022 10:07PM

Criterion

Pro

Tie

Con

Points

Winner

1 point(s)

Reason:

mall failed to address the arguments of con instead asking for him to "answer a question" as opposed to winning the debate