Instigator / Pro
0
1494
rating
6
debates
33.33%
won
Topic

INTEL IS BETTER THAN AMD

Status
Finished

All stages have been completed. The voting points distribution and the result are presented below.

Arguments points
0
0
Sources points
0
0
Spelling and grammar points
0
0
Conduct points
0
0

After not so many votes...

It's a tie!
Parameters
More details
Publication date
Last update date
Category
Technology
Time for argument
One day
Voting system
Open voting
Voting period
One week
Point system
Four points
Rating mode
Rated
Characters per argument
10,000
Required rating
1500
Contender / Con
0
1500
rating
1
debates
50.0%
won
Description
~ 29 / 5,000

AMD SUCKS so yyyaaaaaaaaaaaaa

Round 1
Pro
INTEL HAS BLUE AS LOGO AND SOUND GUD THEREFORE IT IS BETTER IN GAMES AND I HAVE INTEL IN GAMING PC AND IT SO GUD IT GET 30 FPS HIGH IN RIDERS REPUBLIC WITHOUT GPU. YOU CANT WIN.
Con
You'll get more cores, cache, and faster PCIe 4.0 connectivity with AMD's Threadripper lineup, but they do come with higher price tags befitting such monstrous processors. However, when we boil it down to per-core pricing, or how much you pay for each CPU core, AMD does offer a compelling value story.