" Is it not, based on deductive reasoning, that a human is guaranteed to be born with two legs and two arms? "
It can be deducted but not guaranteed because there are people that are born without limbs so it is not guaranteed. It is not guaranteed the person will be born. A newborn is referred to as a miracle.
"We cannot expel this fact because sometimes people are not born with two arms or two legs. It is a guarantee, or very highly guaranteed fact."
This is conflicting. A person either will which is backed up by some evidence or possibly will or not be .
"Guaranteed fact" is an oxymoron. A guarantee doesn't mean in the true realm of causality something will happen but just showcased, played up to be . A fact is not another word for guarantee. I think I said this in the last turn. These two words don't belong in the same context.
Then you add "highly" to it which was the strongly convicted, touted emphasis I was talking about.
The idea of guarantees are truly non sequiturs. This comes from a social network framework wrapped around a feeling of assurance wishful thinking to deliver on promises to ourselves.
This is likewise with the idea of promises.
"Is it not guaranteed, based on not only deductive reasoning, but also pure fact, that when a coin is flipped it will land on one of its two sides? "
If the probability didn't exist that it could land on edge , it would be a fact it lands on a side. High probability or probability or deductive calculation is different from fact that's fixated. It's not erratic, it's the same everytime which is not what guarantee comes out to be.
A guarantee talks a big game but doesn't really have the muscle behind it to support the weight of a play. It's backed up with perhaps "feel good assurance". Which makes sense as it is a social pledge or oath on good faith, not evidence.
Like in a poker game, the player that perhaps feels so confident has the attitude "I can't lose with what I use, I'm hot tonight". The player believes this so much, they feel like they can bluff the other players. The player has won before, yes guaranteed, why not this time?
No, the player can still lose in spite of feeling good. They feel fine until the loss as the the other players saw right through that poker face.
I just want to reiterate what we're talking about here. A guarantee is not another word for fact.
An example, satisfaction guaranteed or your money back. Wait a minute, being that it's guaranteed, meaning something that WILL be the case, there is no "or your money back".
It's a non sequitur so the idea of "guarantees" is to be just thrown out. So far you're demonstrating the non sequiturs in your responses without realizing it. It's because the words , the essence of things are not being looked at when it comes to this.
On the one hand, the position is "something will happen" as a matter of fact. Then on another facet to it, the result is subject to change. That something that "will happen" is not really fact. But it's deductively concluded to happen. All that means is generalized to happen assumed from history but not necessarily bound to occur.
You used the phrase "highly guaranteed". Like saying highly probable. Which that works realistically. A high chance or low chance goes with deduction. However, something that will happen is a one way outcome. There are no different tiers of probability.
Also, debating on whether guarantees are real or not is stupid. You would have to destroy the entire foundation of probability. Literally a die roll is a gaurantee.
Are you willing to have the same discussion, with slight changes to the time for the argument? Everything else will/can stay the same?
Actually, that can be considered a good point. It depends on how Mall views "outside of the box". The first part of the discussion will be the easiest. I had other ideas, but that works as well.
Other than that, you just have to prove the second topic. "Is it really a fact that you're guaranteed to die?"
this might be a loss for me bcuz im dumb
My bad for the mention. Someone took this while I was writing my quesiton.
Isn't it a guarantee that water can only be made up of the elemental compound h20?