Instigator / Pro
4
1500
rating
25
debates
42.0%
won
Topic
#4456

Con has to prove that the Quran contains contradiction

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Better arguments
0
3
Better sources
2
2
Better legibility
1
1
Better conduct
1
1

After 1 vote and with 3 points ahead, the winner is...

YouFound_Lxam
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
5
Time for argument
Two days
Max argument characters
10,000
Voting period
Two weeks
Point system
Multiple criterions
Voting system
Open
Contender / Con
7
1472
rating
32
debates
48.44%
won
Description

I am going to do this debate again to give anyone else the chance to challenge me on the Quran.

I am Pro, Con needs to prove that the Quran contains contradictions

-->
@rayhan16

No problem brother, keep it up :)

-->
@tigerlord

I am still learning brother. I understand your concerns :)

-->
@rayhan16

Brother rayhan what are you doing brother. This is not mere debating, it's about Islam brother our religion. Do not be reckless. Do more efforts. On DDO there was a debate and there were 7 votes for a Muslim guy and vote from me and i gave all 7 points to the Muslim guy. And opposite debater was ex Muslim from Arab country, a good one. Among 43 lost only 1 debate.
because of copy and paste and laziness of Muslim brother he won but left a flaw which I picked. And voted against him because of that. But he called jury and there was big debate for my vote even with the debater. And he himself accepted my RDF and asked jury to be dismissed.
I can not do that ever again. That debate was about miracle of Quran. Here we go about contradictions. So easy to refute. But your laziness got you here. Why not go in deep and study real meaning about those verses? There is exegesis and detail commentary about them.
brother, try harder next time.I pray to Allah to help you next time, ameen.

-->
@rayhan16
@YouFound_Lxam
@Savant

**************************************************
>Reported Vote: Slainte // Mod action: Not Removed
>Voting Policy: info.debateart.com/terms-of-service/voting-policy
>Points Awarded: 3 points to Con (Arguments)
>Reason for Decision:
See Voting Tab
>Reason for Mod Action:
The voter sufficiently explains their reasoning, even expounding upon his RFD in the comments. It is sufficient for the voter to pick an issue they view as pivotal to the debate and focus on how both sides addressed it, though I encourage voters to cover many of the points made in the debate wherever feasible to do so.
**************************************************

-->
@Savant

Ok I'll try to use references properly next time then

-->
@rayhan16

It's hard to weigh sources like that if you reference them but don't quote or summarize them. It would be a bit like Con saying "The Quran has contradictions, read this book by Christopher Hitchens." I can only really score arguments made by each side, not those simply referenced.

-->
@Savant

I understand your point but at the end I did say everything is within the Tafsir.

'(as we are the first of the believers,) means, because we are the first of our people, the Egyptians, to believe. So he killed them all.'

This is Ibn Kathir, one of the best Arabic scholars who interpreted it as 'of his people'.

As well as this, Muslim means 'submitter'. By definition Adam was the first Muslim which again shows that no one after Adam can be the first Muslim ever. It doesn't say in the verses 'ever' it just says 'first of the believers'. All this evidence points to the verses specifically talking about the people at its time. With the Muhammed (PBUH) verse, it talked about his people in the very next verse, suggesting the former was also

-->
@rayhan16

You came very close to winning, in my opinion. The issue I had was that you claimed "awwala almumineena" shouldn't be interpreted literally, but you didn't go much further than that. If it means "first of the believers," then that would seem to imply "first ever." If it doesn't mean that, then you needed to provide more evidence about how the phrase is used in Arabic. A source or even a dictionary definition would have helped.

-->
@Savant

If we take every verse literally within the Quran with no interpretation from the Tafsir nor from a linguistic/Arabic point of view, then certain phrases and sentences won't make sense to the English speaker. It is why we have the interpretations in the first place. First hand Arabic scholars who have studied the Arabic language break down each word and say what it is referring to.

It can be applied to every language. In French, there are certain phrases if we say literally they don't make sense.

I am contesting your vote based on this reason, I don't think you gave that a fair assessment taking in all factors aside from the point it is a different language that is translated into English. Especially if this is the only reason that you voted Con, on this one 'contradiction'.

-->
@rayhan16

"Pro believes it doesn't contain contradictions and Con has to prove it does."

That is your statement. Con is supposed to disprove that using anything.

If I were you, I would be more careful in wording the very title of this webpage.

-->
@Intelligence_06

Well the short description is this: I believe that the Quran contains no contradiction, Con has to prove that it does contain contradictions.

So it clearly states that Pro believes it doesn't contain contradictions and Con has to prove it does.

"Con has to prove that the Quran contains contradiction"

If Con tries to prove that the Quran indeed contains contradictions, that means Con proved the title to be correct, which is the opposite of what Con should do... especially when no explicit topic was given in the description itself either...

bump

-->
@rayhan16

Okay, good luck

-->
@PREZ-HILTON

I just want to clear misconceptions, plus it is fun, it is just the point of the debate

-->
@rayhan16

I wrote a book yesterday though where I claimed the book was from God and there were no contradictions. Not only does it not prove anything, literally no non Muslims even claim there are contradictions.

-->
@PREZ-HILTON

I want to see if anyone else can do it. Plus those who think they can, will realise they can't hopefully and then change their ways. That is the aim!

I would believe otherwise. Of course there are the obvious contradictions, then there are ones, that go more into depth with the basic belief of Islam, all found in the Quran.

I mean, I am convinced no contradictions exist.

-->
@rayhan16

you already conclusively proved the Quran has no contradictions. Why don't you debate something else?