Instigator / Pro
7
1500
rating
5
debates
60.0%
won
Topic
#4986

USA is unable to invade China

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Better arguments
3
0
Better sources
2
2
Better legibility
1
1
Better conduct
1
0

After 1 vote and with 4 points ahead, the winner is...

Kouen
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
3
Time for argument
One day
Max argument characters
10,000
Voting period
One week
Point system
Multiple criterions
Voting system
Open
Contender / Con
3
1492
rating
15
debates
50.0%
won
Description

I (kouen) will argue that the USA can't try to invade China and succeed(less than 50% chance) while the opponent will argue that if the USA tries to invade China, USA is likely(higher than 50% chance) to succeed.

"Succeed" being : USA captures Beijing/Peking (the capital)

-->
@Intelligence_06

China has the capability to do the same. Also, destroying the capital doesn't do much. Not all of China's powerful politicians live in Beijing. China would still have its entire military as there are no bases in Beijing. The American helicopters would be easily destroyed, and China would nuke every major American city; USA would nuke every major Chinese city; Everyone loses the war.

-->
@Intelligence_06

This assumes Russia and North Korea would not want to get involved.

Additionally, China has nukes, too.

However, I don't live in China so I have no idea how military capable the CCP truly is.

Apologies for forfeiture, ran out of time due to my schedule. Interesting topic, and I believe a better argument could be made on my part if I had more time to research the topic. Good debate.

This is a debate I would be interested in

Throwing three large nukes at where Beijing approximately is is enough for the US to just fly helicopters here and claim it.

They wouldn't want to do that, but if they do want so, they have an almost 100% success rate doing so.