Instigator / Con
0
1500
rating
4
debates
25.0%
won
Topic
#5195

God Exists Le Quatrieme

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Better arguments
0
0
Better sources
0
0
Better legibility
0
0
Better conduct
0
0

After not so many votes...

It's a tie!
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
3
Time for argument
One day
Max argument characters
250
Voting period
One week
Point system
Multiple criterions
Voting system
Open
Contender / Pro
0
1479
rating
316
debates
39.08%
won
Description

Pro
As a proponent you are declaring the statement of a god existence to be true. This debate will request that you provide evidence of this claim. The proof have to be verifiable and cannot be based on faith. A "prove he does not exists" will not be accepted as the basis of the debate is validation of a claim and not invalidation of a claim.

Con
This person is one who does accept the statement. This person will provide their reasoning for not accepting the claim and reasoning for not accepting the claim. The focus of this person is to provide understandable reasons for not believing in the existence of a god.|

Now the last debate had the pro enter pages of "proof" to their claim. all of it was assumptions and the result was that god must exists.

I will not accept any assumptions. Attempting to provide rational explanations without validation is invalid. If you make a claim provide explicit evidence of the claim.

Also - I want simple direct evidence - I don't want to read pages for a claim and in the end just see assumptions. Please provide the concrete evidence that I requested.

Round 1
Con
#1
I proposea very simple test, The test is a request for "GOD" to show himself -visually to me. As many times I have requested god to show themselves - theydid not. So the conclusion is that I cannot validate the existence of a god.
Pro
#2
Any person you see , every time you see a person, you see god.

There's the evidence you can see for yourself.

The ideology behind this god that you see is he or she conforms to his or herself making themselves the authority. They don't rebel against themselves as their own authority hence being god.

-R2



Round 2
Con
#3
-->  Any person you see , every time you see a person, you see god.

how does this prove the exitance of a god - are you saying all human beings are god? 
Pro
#4
You read all about this regarding people that hold and accept this ideology of human beings.

Perhaps ironically these people are also classified as atheists.

This is detailed in the satanic bible but because of the character limit I can't fully explain.

We read on about Laveyan satanism. 
Round 3
Con
#5
I am not asking about ideology

I specifically started this debate to discuss the exitance of a god. I want to see explicit proof of this
can you provide explicit proof of an all powerful being (god)?
Pro
#6
This individual wants proof but limits the space to provide it.

I'm going to continue on fitting much as I can.

A human god . 

 The personification of a person has the power within, the autonomy , not from a government or external figure. A person has it all as a personified deity.