Assigning objective truths as moral values is valid over arguing morality is objective.
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
After 2 votes and with 14 points ahead, the winner is...
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 4
- Time for argument
- One week
- Max argument characters
- 30,000
- Voting period
- One month
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
- Open
Disclaimer : Regardless of the setup for voting win or lose, The aim of this interaction, Is for those that view it, Learn and or take away anything that will amount to any constructive value ultimately. So that counts as anything that'll cause one to reconsider an idea, Understand a subject better, Help build a greater wealth of knowledge getting closer to truth. When either of us has accomplished that with any individual here, That's who the victor of the debate becomes.
People argue whether morality is subjective or objective . The resolution is just to operate by objective truths.
The morality that is touted as objective is from a subjective assessment.
If you believe that holding objective truths to use as a basis of a compass is another way of saying you hold to objective morality as a stance, come forth to prove that. It is not .
Questions on the topic, send a message.
full forfeiture
Full Forfeiture
People argue whether morality is subjective or objective . The resolution is just to operate by objective truths.
The morality that is touted as objective is from a subjective assessment.
If you believe that holding objective truths to use as a basis of a compass is another way of saying you hold to objective morality as a stance, come forth to prove that. It is not .
No takers, topic is too deep.