Songs that are not gay but are kinda sus battle

I think with a debate like this going Round by Round is unfair but Pro messed up a link so if I score, Con has at least 86% odds to win instead of 50%, if you consider all the variables and have 86% as the bare minimum odds Con has to win even if he picks meh songs (not terrible ones that's in the 14%).

The first stage I'll run through is a disqualification stage. Instead of ranking songs on how gay vs not gay yet sus vs not sus they are I think it's safer and fairer to just outright disqualify songs I hear actual homosexuality mentioned in (I'll allow lesbianism to be gay, I haven't heard part Round 1 before writing this so don't know if that's involved) and then disqualify any that aren't sus.

D or A Disqualified vs Approved:

R1
Both A

R2
Pro A
Con D (zero sus)

R3
Pro D (this context of sus is not what the debate meant at all)
I think the 'sus' here is pedo sus? Because they say 'lil'... Okay Con A...

R4
Technical Pro A, video is not the song but the 'rainbow' does hint something.
Con D zero sus?

R5
Pro D (not a song)
Con... A I guess, I supposed it's serial killer and pedo vibes alike.

Now what I'll do is rate the songs and base it only on that, this way the songs are what win the debate and the qualifier filter has already been applied.

Pro 1
57/100

listenable but gets annoying after 2 listens, severely.

Pro 2
37/100

Decent guitar, okay enough rhyme scheme but the voice is fucking disgusting to the ear. Idk why this guy thinks he's cut out to be a singer, his voice is vile to my ears shit was unlistenable and a chore to endure, I will be honest, I didn't listen to it all. Also while the guitar was okay, the melody was pure 'on repeat garbage' vibes.

Pro 4
Due to length it's docked points.
If he'd used the original he'd have scored more.

The song he played is just 82/100, real thing is closer to 91.

176 Pro

Con 1
17/100 Could barely make it through that shit. The voice, the fucking everything to my ears was disgusting. It is still musical to some degree and has rhyming.

Con 3
This song makes me wonder what kind of brain is needed to find it actually 'sus' but anyway...

34/100

The hook is okay, annoying voice but decent enough. It's all 'decent' other than the really displeasing voices and dogshit bars. Mumbly anunciation throughout, fucking irritating autotune. It's just barely okay. The dude at verse 2 is the most garbage rapper i've heard in a long time. Disgusting he thinks that's a career worthy verse to call himself a pro at it. Verse 1 at least had 'tries' that didn't land.

Con 5

70/100

This is a solid 7/10 track. Lyrically it's both impressive and vile because it's obvious this edgelord is using the most vile stuff to seem original for the sake of it, horrorcore is nothing new, he's trying to make himself seem cutting edge but gore/horrocore has been done as has the creepy vibe. It's good decent flow and rhyme scheme. I wish he'd cut off more for the hook, gives a headache how long his bars go without a pause.

His voice is clearly meh as fuck at singing but I appreciate he didn't do the autotuning too much at all throughout.

It's one of those songs that's okay until you pay attention to either his voice tone, the vibe or to the lyrics. As an example of rap you'd never show your parents and throw in the garbage after a listen but respect the art of, it's a good track.

121

Pro wins.