Instigator / Con
7
1520
rating
6
debates
66.67%
won
Topic

Animal testing

Status
Finished

All stages have been completed. The voting points distribution and the result are presented below.

Arguments points
3
0
Sources points
2
2
Spelling and grammar points
1
1
Conduct points
1
1

With 1 vote and 3 points ahead, the winner is ...

Brendo
Parameters
More details
Publication date
Last update date
Category
Science
Time for argument
One day
Voting system
Open voting
Voting period
One week
Point system
Four points
Rating mode
Rated
Characters per argument
30,000
Contender / Pro
4
1484
rating
1
debates
0.0%
won
Description
~ 233 / 5,000

Animal testing is commonly used to test products such as drugs. The argument is that testing on animals is very similar to testing on humans. I disagree and believe that animal testing does not work as much as people believe it does.

Added:
--> @Brendo

I think if your a murderer, you should die by a formula I call PL^3. If you killed 1 person by shooting, then getting experimented on while conscious is too harsh. If you killed 10+ people or enough people to the point that it would be almost impossible to accurately prescribe pain, then death by experimentation sounds like a good idea. If you murdered less people, then PL^3 sounds like a good formula.

P is the amount of pain the victims died with.

L is the number of lives the murderer took.

If you murder 1 person by a shooting, such a murderer deserves to be shot.

If you murder 2 people by a stabbing, such a murderer deserves to be killed by a method 8x as painful as getting stabbed.

I would want these executions to be public in stadiums so ticket sales can pay for the execution and can provide the government with more money.

This is my idea. Let me know what you think of it.