Artificial intelligence will eventually surpass human intelligence
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
After 3 votes and with 11 points ahead, the winner is...
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 3
- Time for argument
- Three days
- Max argument characters
- 150
- Voting period
- One week
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
- Open
No information
Con demerited by full forfeiture.
However, I have often wondered how AI would demonstrate intelligence if it never had input. Pro demonstrated the effect very well, unfortunately demonstrating pure, artificial intelligence, in R1, and, otherwise, balked. The only problem is, Pro's R1 argument offered perfect support for Con's position: artificial illegibility, first and last. In the face of Con's forfeiture, and virtual lack of supporting argument for Pro, even though Pro was present, in good conscience, I cannot award Pro the win for simple lack of argument for that side.
Full forfeiture
I award all points to Pro on account of complete forfeiture by Con.
I might accept with some definitions provided.
What is with people criticizing these resolutions. Can't we just let them fight out the interpretation in the debate?
Surpass in what way? Having a vague resolution won't help you here.
Yes. Plus, when I want to know something, AI gives much better replies than most humans, and much faster too. Like, average human cant answer even 1% of things AI can.
well yes it has, those who r relying on it
It already surpassed most humans. 😅