Instigator / Con
7
1500
rating
1
debates
100.0%
won
Topic
#6066

The Protestant Doctrine of Sola Scriptura

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Better arguments
3
0
Better sources
2
2
Better legibility
1
1
Better conduct
1
0

After 1 vote and with 4 points ahead, the winner is...

Emanon
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
3
Time for argument
Two days
Max argument characters
10,000
Voting period
One week
Point system
Multiple criterions
Voting system
Open
Contender / Pro
3
1500
rating
1
debates
0.0%
won
Description

This debate is to be had assuming that Christianity is true. Con (myself) will be arguing that the Protestant doctrine of Sola Scriptura is false. Pro will be arguing that it is true. We would be examining Sola Scriptura as contrasted with extra-Biblical divine revelation, Sacred Tradition being a part of the Deposit of Faith, institutions such as the Church having authority to interpret Scripture, etc.

Unless you get messages from God, it is a good doctrine since scripture is said to have divine inspiration and to be a word of God, where words of people arent exactly words of God.

As much as I see Catholics and orthodox Christians try to debate this, I have never heard of a protestant arguing for Sola Scriptura.

They only have a gut feeling or blind faith in Sola Scriptura , it's not a philosophical position anyone ever seriously defends.

If you watched a Benny Hinn performance and thought "yeah this is a deeply philosophical person who can reasonably defend Sola Scriptura" than you have fooled yourself.

Nobody defends that position though they believe in it, so it's pointless to do.

If you want to debate protests to than you'll need to find their actual criticisms of your religion