My opponent wasted his round 3 providing no new arguments and not responding to any of mine. So we must conclude he conceded to all my arguments.
I have successfully met my burden of proof by demonstrating that Best.Korea's reform is necessary.............???
My opponent didnt finish his sentence. Necessary for what? There is no any goal in debate topic or description which reform is necessary to achieve, thus reform is not necessary by tautology.
As Best.Korea has demonstrated dedication to the site, and empathy for other people. It stands to reason he should continue acting in both these ways and sacrifice his dedication to being a troll.
Unproved claim. Empathy and dedication to site, even if true, arent really reasons to change someone's public image. Person doesnt base whole thinking on these two, and these two dont even include improving public image in their definitions. But with empathy and dedication to site being unproved claims, argument further falls apart. There was no proof presented that I have any empathy. Anyone can pretend he has empathy, while not actually having it. Further, there are different types of empathy and different levels of empathy which dont include improving public image. There are also different types of dedication, and not all dedication includes improving public image. Some dedication is more about trying to subjugate rather than just to be present there.
My opponent didnt define what reform is in description, thus we must use definition from dictionary of English language.
Reform in English dictionary is defined as "change something to improve it".
My opponent is faced with a very simple burden. He must prove the part of topic which is "should change public image to improve it"
So those are 3 burdens:
1. Should
2. Change
3. Improve
"Improvement" wasnt defined in this debate for 3 whole rounds and wasnt defined in description either, so the only thing thats left is dictionary definition. What is "improvement"? Since dictionary definition of "improvement" in official dictionary is circular and also doesnt include anything my opponent said here in debate, and doesnt include what topic says, it follows that burden of proof cannot be met by using official dictionary.
Further, since many people have many different definitions of improvement, many completely opposite definitions, my own being opposite to theirs as well, it follows that I cannot possibly act to satisfy all these different definitions as they are all opposite and different, making this resolution impossible to achieve for me, and everything my opponent said is incorrect as a result. There is no way for us to determine here which definition of improvement is to be used, as definitions must be agreed upon first in order to have a debate, thus should have been in description.
Further, since my definition of "improvement" isnt to "change" my public image, then the resolution is negated, as resolution requires change as well as improvement.
I dont think my public image needs any improvement, as it is already at its best it will ever be.
My opponent didnt include in the topic or description what exactly needs to be changed, and to what, so nothing to debate there either.
Also, since is-ought problem wasnt solved, and "should" wasnt defined even after I asked for a definition multiple times, it is not possible to conclude that I should do anything here, because "should" was left out to be unproved and undefined by my opponent.
So with failing to define and prove "should", "improve" and "change", there is nothing to debate here, and resolution just fails due to no agreed definitions.
My opponent gave no any sources, so all his claims are unsupported.
My opponent could have placed definitions in description or at least in round 1, but without any definitions in place, debate is not possible and topic fails.
no prob dear.
(づ｡◕‿‿◕｡)づ
Thanks for the vote!
Yeah, I did focus too much on definitions lol
I kinda like it. Might even use it in my other debates.
Thank you for supporting Best.Korea's decision to reform.
Thanks for the vote!
Vote? Just one? 😅
You can do it. I believe in you.