Instigator / Pro
9
1578
rating
200
debates
54.75%
won
Topic
#6098

Fire magic and blood magic is real

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Better arguments
3
6
Better sources
4
2
Better legibility
2
2
Better conduct
0
2

After 2 votes and with 3 points ahead, the winner is...

vi_777
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Rated
Number of rounds
3
Time for argument
Two days
Max argument characters
10,000
Voting period
Two weeks
Point system
Multiple criterions
Voting system
Open
Minimal rating
None
Contender / Con
12
1521
rating
11
debates
63.64%
won
Description

Fire magic definition:
Type of magic which uses fire and offerings to the fire as a way of achieving effect.

Blood magic definition:
Type of magic which uses one's own blood as a way of achieving effect.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Round 3 forfeit gives conduct to Con.

Round 2 shows Con exposing Pro's definitions as backfiring. Pro's definitions of fire magic and blood magic backfire. They do not let trickery alone be a validated magic form.

This sealed the deal as seen by Pro forfeiting Round 3.

This was semantic sepukku.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

I am leaving arguments as a tie because the common definition of magic isnt magic tricks. And arguing that magic tricks and illusions are real comes a bit strange, when they are by definition fake.

Conduct to Con due to forfeit.