Instigator / Con
0
1500
rating
8
debates
50.0%
won
Topic
#6101
Is Using A Chatbot Here Cheating?
Status
Finished
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
Winner & statistics
After not so many votes...
It's a tie!
Parameters
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 4
- Time for argument
- One week
- Max argument characters
- 10,000
- Voting period
- One week
- Point system
- Winner selection
- Voting system
- Open
Contender / Pro
0
1500
rating
7
debates
57.14%
won
Description
Using a chatbot in a formal debate offers substantial educational and practical benefits. Chatbots can enhance preparation and engagement by helping debaters develop arguments, refine communication skills, and receive immediate, tailored feedback . They support critical thinking and language awareness, enabling users to construct more coherent and persuasive cases while also learning to evaluate evidence and reasoning .
Furthermore, chatbots provide efficient, cost-effective assistance, making high-quality debate practice accessible to more participants and reducing the workload for educators . Their ability to simulate real debate scenarios and act as virtual mentors helps debaters sharpen their skills in a dynamic and interactive manner.
Round 1
A chatbot improves a debate and benefits both sides by providing a realistic, engaging opponent that challenges participants to refine their arguments and think critically 4 5 . It offers instant, constructive feedback, helping debaters strengthen their reasoning and communication skills in real time 5 6 . Chatbots also expose users to diverse perspectives, encouraging them to consider multiple angles and develop more nuanced positions 5 . This environment is safe and supportive, allowing both sides to practice, experiment, and learn without fear of judgment 5 . Ultimately, chatbots make debates more interactive, accessible, and effective for skill development on both sides 1 4 5 .
Citations:
- https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0360131523001392
- https://www.nfhs.org/articles/embracing-benefits-of-ai-in-high-school-speech-and-debate/
- https://writingmate.ai/blog/debate-with-ai
- https://www.jstor.org/stable/48766178
- https://www.sherbertlearning.com/post/empowering-student-engagement-enhance-debating-skills-with-ai
- https://www.junia.ai/tools/ai-debate-generator
- https://www.reddit.com/r/Debate/comments/11z836l/debatedevil_ai_for_practicing_debates/
- https://blog.khanacademy.org/mastering-the-art-of-debating-with-ai-khanmigo-kl/
Perplexity: pplx.ai/share
Forfeited
Round 2
If both sides have equal access to similar tools, then using a chatbot is no more cheating than consulting a textbook or using spell-check. The key is transparency and fairness, not the specific tools used.
Using a chatbot can actually raise the standard of debate by encouraging participants to focus on higher-level skills: critical thinking, synthesis, and rebuttal. Instead of spending time searching for basic facts, debaters can devote their energy to crafting nuanced arguments and engaging more deeply with opposing viewpoints.
Unless explicitly prohibited, using a chatbot in a debate is not cheating-it's a modern resource that, when used responsibly, can enhance the quality and rigor of intellectual discourse.
Forfeited
Round 3
Forfeited
Forfeited
Round 4
Using a chatbot in a debate isn’t just a wise move—it’s a power play that can give you a real edge. Here’s why:
First, chatbots powered by large language models have proven themselves as formidable debaters. In recent studies, AI chatbots outperformed humans in persuasion, winning about 64% of online debates—even when given only minimal information about their opponents. That’s not just luck; it’s the result of instant access to massive knowledge, lightning-fast argument construction, and the ability to tailor responses to the audience.
Chatbots don’t get flustered, forget their facts, or need a coffee break. They can sift through hundreds of sources in seconds, structure arguments logically, and deliver evidence-based rebuttals with the precision of a debate champion. Whether you need a well-cited statistic, a counterargument, or a witty comeback, a chatbot can provide it on demand—no stage fright, no bias, just pure, focused reasoning.
And let’s not forget versatility. Chatbots can take on any perspective, challenge your assumptions, and help you see weaknesses in your own arguments before your opponent does. Practicing with a chatbot is like having a debate partner who’s always available, never judgmental, and endlessly patient.In short, using a chatbot in debate isn’t just smart—it’s like bringing a Swiss Army knife to a war of words.
If you want to boost your critical thinking, sharpen your rhetoric, and maybe even win a few more arguments, there’s no better ally than a well-trained AI.
Forfeited
you should be winner,. anyone can use chatbot as a tool like pen , but idea, words should be yours, the purpose of debating should not be spoiled by ai, debating improves some of your skills. we can use chat gpt for decorations , mistake checking purposes.
I approve of AI for debate and could debate you using it.
How voters view those points isn’t something we prescribe. They are required to at least do more than just ignore them entirely, particularly in the context of this debate.
I am asking because he is actually using purely AI made arguments in this very debate. If there is no rule preventing voters from rejecting AI made arguments, he is at a disadvantage.
As per always, voters are allowed a good deal of leeway when it comes to what they do and do not consider a legitimate argument. So long as they explain their reasoning and provide justifications for considering or not considering certain points, it can be valid.
That being said, considering that this debate’s topic explicitly challenges one of the main reasons for dismissing points that are written by AI, voters will be expected to at least show that they considered points from the debate itself and not just dismiss them off hand.
You are going to have to ask mods about the voting issue here. Usually, voters rarely favor ChatGPT arguments. In fact, the use of AI can lead to auto loss every time.
I am curious here, do voters have to accept arguments completely made by AI?