ai is good

Ai taking over our jobs is more sided with the illogical side than the logical.
While pro may have some point in his argument, con uses it as a counter and therefore provides better and more detailed reasons.

Take over jobs implies doing the task of the job, letting us relax and/or do others.

However, the rebuttal that we make no money does neutralise it as neither elaborated on either I vote tie.

Pro’s argument of a.i. taking our jobs as a good result is a nod to entitlement, which is pure laziness for all but the infirm, and even many of them still express sufficient ambition to go to work.
Con’s rebuttal is successful because loss of income potential is also results in entitlement by loss of self-esteem

Pro literally argued for Con's side of the debate. @jonrohith read the debate a bit more closely next time.

Topic selection by pro itself says he is winner, con failed to give logical arguments.