Meowbah can beat Allah in a fight. Meowbah can beat Jesus in a fight. Ameow. Inshallah.
The participant that receives the most points from the voters is declared a winner.
Voting will end in:
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 1
- Time for argument
- Two days
- Max argument characters
- 10,000
- Voting period
- One week
- Point system
- Winner selection
- Voting system
- Open
Meowism is the religion of Meowbah. If you are a meowist, you must pray to Meowbah/Meowballah each night
I am Meowist. I believe in God Meowbah.
Site doesnt let me select Meowism as my religion.
I consider this as insult to my God Meowbah.
All hail Meowbah, the most merciful, gracious.
Meowbah wills it!
Pro acceptable argument
Con no argument by forfeit.
Pro wins
Pro:
Only one side showed up. Pro gave an actual argument (even if absurd or satirical), while Con said nothing meaningful and just forfeited.
Con:
Didn’t debate. Just called it BS and bailed.
No arguments, no effort. Even a joke debate needs some reasoning — Con gave zero.
THOU IDK BUT UH CON IG, WASN'T ONLINE, MAYBE FOR SOME CERTAIN REASONS, THAT'S WHY THEY DIDN'T REALLY PUBLISH ANY ARGUMENT///// UM WELL SO IDK BUT SHOULDN'T THERE BE SOME SORTA THING FOR A TIE OR WHT IF ONE DEBATEE ISN'T ABLE TO ARGUE???
TBH, I STILL DIDN'T GET WHT THIS WAS ALL///// 😑
Forfeiture.
""Can" is really ambiguous, since anything can happen"
So my topic is unbeatable!
FYI, the resolution could be better. "Can" is really ambiguous, since anything can happen (such as R. Kelly filmed himself raping an underage girl, and the jury believed his lawyer that it was possible she was the devil so acquitted him). "Most likely" is far better.
Here's how I would rewrite this resolution:
"Meowbah would most likely beat Allah or Jesus Christ in a fight. Ameow. Inshallah."
Thank you for vote 😊
Meow Akbar!
Meow wins here. Cast one vote.