God exists

• According to the law, if matter cannot be created nor destroyed, where did it come from?
  
• There's always an artist behind a painting - God is described as an eternal and divine being, leaving reasonable justification that God is the artist behind the construction of matter.
  

"But then what created God"

• HP is described as a being who has always been, and always will be.
  
• We as humans are fixated upon the idea that there is a cause/initiator for everything.
  
• The problem is that if you keep going back in time and asking the question - what created this? - You will eventually find that there is a starting point, who has not been created, but is the beginning of creation itself. Hence the organisms of our realm being called CREATURES - originating from the Latin word "creatura," which means "something created" or "a created being".
  

• HP is described to live outside of time itself, outside of the human realm.
  
• Furthermore, the concept extends - a being outside of time itself, where there is 0 human knowledge - lives within conditions, realms, concepts, etc where the concept of creation may not be necessary for life to exist.
  

"But, 1+1=2 and energy, 'exist."

"We see and know 'them, not so many of us see and know 'God."

• Not everything is as simple as 1+1 = 2. As much as we wish they were.
  
• We do see and know these simple concepts, but there are still many things which remain unseen - this does not essentially mean that they do not exist.
  

"If existence has infinity to gamble, our current state of existence was 'bound to happen at 'some point."

"Life exists because certain conditions happened to be met"

"Just seems to me the way of things."

"Existence 'is as it 'is, when something is, it does what it 'is."

"Patterns emerge from that."

"It's just dice."

• We cannot use the lazy argument that our existence is merely a "lucky" throw of a "dice" - there are none, or at least not enough signs that existence has "infinity" to gamble.
  
• Looking at the world through the lens of - 'it is what it is, must have just been luck' - is dismissing the evidence of the beginning of the universe, along with  a lazy dismissal to the question of a HP.
  

Intelligent design of some type would be more believable to me if the conditions for life did not appear to be met.

An oasis in the desert? Reasonable. A city with Hanging Gardens? 'That, Looks artificial.

• A city with hanging gardens would seem reasonable to you if you'd grow up in its reality.
  
• Let's face it - we find the norms of our current reality to be the only thing reasonable. Anything outside of our reality - like cities sitting on oceans, or a city with hanging gardens may seem artificial.
  
• Even the laws of physics are based upon our reality, had we lived in an opposite version of this reality, the laws and forms of this reality would seem artificial.
  
• Therefore, the definition of an intelligent design can be anything.; it's easy to overlook intellect when you constantly see and live in it all you life.
  

"Why can the material world not be timeless, spaceless, and immaterial?"

"If it has existed forever,"

"Expands into nothingness back onto itself,"

"Contains immaterial concepts?"

• The material world cannot be timeless, spaceless and immaterial.
  
• We know from cosmic background radiation that there was a beginning of this universe, often referred to as the Big Bang.
  
• Furthermore, this beginning of the universe is the beginning of time itself.
  
• Ultimately, this world cannot be timeless because the concept of time itself was created from its beginning.
  

"But out of source point paranoia, an addon."

The sun, some say,

"formed approximately 4.6 billion[a] years ago from the gravitational collapse of matter within a region of a large molecular cloud. Most of this matter gathered in the centre; the rest flattened into an orbiting disk that became the Solar System. The central mass became so hot and dense that it eventually initiated nuclear fusion in its core."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun

Fuel,

"The origin of fossil fuels is the anaerobic decomposition of buried dead organisms. The conversion from these organic materials to high-carbon fossil fuels is typically the result of a geological process of millions of years.[4] Due to the length of time it takes for them to form, fossil fuels are considered non-renewable resources."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fossil_fuel

"Bunch of useless energy, 'eventually becomes useful again."

• This is completely irrelevant to our argument.
  
• Furthermore, I'd advise stepping away from using wiki, as it's not exactly reliable.
  

"For all we know existence reaches some critical mass of chaos,"

"Becomes a single massive black hole, only to explode outward in a Big Bang ad nauseam."

"Perhaps that is what this existence is, an eternal repetition of monkeys at typewriters,"

"Every possibility eventually being, as time loops around to the start again."

"Eternal return, as some people say."

• It is was it is.
  
• It was just a lucky occurrence out of infinity.
  
• Since it's unseen can't exist.
  
• It just happened to be.