Instigator / Pro
1500
rating
5
debates
50.0%
won
Topic
#6668

Morality cannot exist without religion

Status
Debating

Waiting for the next argument from the instigator.

Round will be automatically forfeited in:

00
DD
:
00
HH
:
00
MM
:
00
SS
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
4
Time for argument
Two days
Max argument characters
3,500
Voting period
One month
Point system
Winner selection
Voting system
Open
Contender / Con
1500
rating
0
debates
0.0%
won
Description

No information

Round 1
Pro
#1
Hello. What is your opinion on why morality cannot exist without religion
Con
#2
Hello, and thank you in advance for the opportunity to have a discussion and mutually expand our knowledge and experience :3

To begin, I must first clarify how I interpret the thesis presented in the topic. I believe that a person can be considered moral even if they do not believe in religion itself (for example, a nihilist who, based on rational analysis, decides not to kill). 

However, if we interpret the thesis to mean that morality itself (i.e., a moral code) must inherently stem from religion, then this assumption misses the mark slightly.

I think that morality as such can be a natural outcome of conscious analysis. Most of the behaviors that Christianity, among others, is based on simply work well in the long term and allow us to function within a society. The moral principles we believe in do not necessarily have to be rooted in religion.

The third interpretation (which I believe is the most likely) concerns the genesis of the moral principles upheld by our society. It cannot be denied that the direct root of moral values and principles in European culture is Christianity—for this reason, for instance, morality truly could not have existed without religion. However, it is worth realizing *why* morality had to stem from religion. It was necessary not only because it simply works, but because values and standards of behavior had to be legitimized in some way - namely, by the authority of a higher being (God). If we were to reject Christianity as our standard of values (which essentially means rejecting the entirety of European behavioral models and norms), we would be left with principles that are impossible to justify.
Round 2
Pro
#3
Forfeited
Con
#4
I’ll add one more point that I forgot to mention earlier. Nietzsche proposed a bold course of action that involved rejecting Christian morality ('slave morality'), but I believe he was wrong. A world devoid of the heritage of the Christian faith would be, at best, bleak, and at worst—catastrophic. While Christianity may not have invented most of its principles, it skillfully curated and consolidated the best fruits of other Eastern cultures.
Round 3
Not published yet
Not published yet
Round 4
Not published yet
Not published yet