The female body is classically "beautiful."

(Hello, and thank you in advance for the opportunity to have a discussion and mutually expand our knowledge and experience :3)

At the very outset, I would like to clarify that I am neither a sexist nor a misogynist, and I do not objectify women. However, for the sake of this discussion, given the multitude of personalities, I will focus on the physical aspect - that is, corporeality and primal reflexes, namely the instincts of both sexes in the *Homo sapiens* species.

The next issue is defining what exactly I mean by "beauty." In the context of this debate and the context of the sexes, I consider beauty to be: deep aesthetics, the harmony of the body not only through its appearance but also through the design that both sexes received as a result of evolution (or an act of creation by God).

Having defined what exactly lies behind this concept, I can move on to defending the thesis I have put forward.

I consider the female body to be more "beautiful" not only because of the statistically more frequent body proportions resulting from sexual dimorphism i.e., wider hips, breasts, and a larger, differently distributed amount of adipose tissue that makes men's heads spin.

I would focus more on the design that "guided" nature (or God) in endowing women with these traits.

would like to point out that, as I mentioned above, the traits we now associate with eroticism have their genesis in motherhood and procreation . I believe there is no need to explain the functions of specific organs here. Since the dawn of civilization, women have been treated with reverence precisely because they were, in a way, the "creators of life" [e.g., the Seated Woman of Çatalhöyük, the Hindu goddess Durga, etc.] (naturally not alone, however, women bear a greater biological "cost" in bearing offspring). Furthermore, it is women who are more often identified with traits we would call more civilized. Women are generally characterized by greater emotionality, empathy, and superior skills in forging close interpersonal relationships.

Men, on the other hand, are characterized by a defined and distinctly different external appearance, but, more importantly, a different internal one. I would venture to say that men are closer to "animality," driven in part by the influence of testosterone on their instincts and behaviors - such as a greater propensity for competition and aggression, but also an enhanced ability to perform under constant pressure and stress. These internal traits exert a decisive influence on their physical characteristics. Broad shoulders, more muscular arms and thighs, along with reduced and differently distributed body fat, were meant to ensure that a man was not merely a loving family patriarch, but an effective killer—one who could provide for his family and guarantee their survival through the coming winter. Research also shows that infants tend to look longer and more frequently at female faces, recognizing them over male ones, as they perceive them to be more familiar and "friendly."

-->Reaserch here

However, please do not jump to hasty conclusions. I am not suggesting that men are absolutely incapable of possessing "beautiful" traits,  rather, as I outlined above, these are simply a byproduct of them being fashioned into effective killers. I believe one can certainly find heroism in masculine traits, but I would remind you that just as we might marvel at the tale of the noble King Arthur, it would be equally primal and human to revel in the sight of Achilles brutalizing his enemies.

I look forward to continuing our conversation! Warmest regards :DD