Instigator / Pro
42
1403
rating
16
debates
21.88%
won
Topic

Rafael Nadal Is Better Than Roger Federer

Status
Finished

All stages have been completed. The voting points distribution and the result are presented below.

Arguments points
18
6
Sources points
12
8
Spelling and grammar points
6
4
Conduct points
6
0

With 6 votes and 24 points ahead, the winner is ...

Joshua_Stebold
Parameters
More details
Publication date
Last update date
Category
Sports
Time for argument
Three days
Voting system
Open voting
Voting period
Two weeks
Point system
Four points
Rating mode
Rated
Characters per argument
30,000
Contender / Con
18
1374
rating
11
debates
4.55%
won
Description
~ 0 / 5,000

No information

Round 1
Pro
Thank you for accepting my challenge, Alanwang123.
Now, this is my argument:

Rafael Nadal is definitely better than Roger Federer. 
1. Nadal is younger and can move faster than Federer.
2. Nadal is better trained than Federer and has a better coach, in my opinion.
3. Nadal has a better serve than Federer and can ace him.
4. Nadal is better at directing the ball than Federer.
Conclusion: Nadal can beat Federer with these advantages, provided he does not have any injuries, making him a better tennis player.
Con
Hello, Joshua_Stebold. Now, what you've said is quite true. Nadal does have some advantages. However, the main reason Nadal is losing current matches is because he get's injured way too easily. Federer has less chance in injury, making it easier to beat Nadal.

Over to you :)
Round 2
Pro
I am fully aware of what you just mentioned. However, we are debating which tennis player has better skill. That is definitely Nadal.
Con
Forfeited
Round 3
Pro
Forfeited
Con
Forfeited