Instigator / Pro
22
1266
rating
119
debates
15.97%
won
Topic

I am a Communist and I hate everyone who has more moneys than me which is everyone

Status
Finished

All stages have been completed. The voting points distribution and the result are presented below.

Arguments points
9
24
Sources points
10
16
Spelling and grammar points
3
8
Conduct points
0
8

With 8 votes and 34 points ahead, the winner is ...

Ramshutu
Parameters
More details
Publication date
Last update date
Category
Movies
Time for argument
One day
Voting system
Open voting
Voting period
One month
Point system
Four points
Rating mode
Rated
Characters per argument
30,000
Contender / Con
56
1758
rating
42
debates
94.05%
won
Description
~ 0 / 5,000

No information

Added:
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better spelling and grammar
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Full forfeit

Added:
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better spelling and grammar
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Forfeiture.

Added:
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better spelling and grammar
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

FF

Added:
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better spelling and grammar
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

I'm tired of debates that center an argument around something unprovable, like someone's personal opinion. There is technically no way for Con to prove that Pro's opinion is, especially in contradiction to what Pro says.
If the argument cannot be logically made, then it is not a debate. As it is not a debate, Pro loses automatically for creating a false debate. There isn't technically a clause in the CoC about this, but there should be.
Conduct goes to Con because Pro purposely created an undebatable topic.

Added:
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better spelling and grammar
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Apoplectic anti-counterclimatic vote blob

Added:
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better spelling and grammar
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Unapologetic vote bob.

Added:
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better spelling and grammar
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

I can't believe you accepted the debate. I wanted to but guess you did.

The Instigator/Pro forfeited half the Rounds which can be seen with Type1 forfeting Round 2. This meant Ramshutu did not recieve a rebuttal to his claims and went unchallenged.

Bad conduct.

Added:
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better spelling and grammar
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Pro FF half of the rounds, that's poor conduct.