Instigator / Pro
17
1266
rating
119
debates
15.97%
won
Topic
#858
Communism are the best system ever conveiced of by man
Status
Finished
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
Winner & statistics
After 6 votes and with 25 points ahead, the winner is...
Ramshutu
Parameters
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 2
- Time for argument
- One day
- Max argument characters
- 30,000
- Voting period
- Two weeks
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
- Open
Contender / Con
42
1764
rating
43
debates
94.19%
won
Description
No information
Round 1
in cokmmunism tyou have the means of production for everythione instead of a fat jewish kyke nigger owning your balls
The best system ever invented or conceived of by man is the process of differential diagnosis.
This allows a doctor to examine an individual, and use a specialized diagnostic methodology to be able to quickly reach a helpful diagnosis of an individual.
For example, if a rabid idiot begins posting pointless and nonsensical debates on a random debate website, a psychologist would be able to perform a differential diagnosis to determine the route cause and nature of this individuals obvious personality disorder and medicate as necessary.
Round 2
Forfeited
Extend!
The interpretation moderation uses of that rule automatically deletes (that is, moderates) votes which vote for the forfeiting side of the full forfeit. It is prohibited to vote for the FFing side. You may dislike the rule, but it is going to be enforced. This is not really up for debate, RM.
No it isn't. It says they will be moderated as any other vote would, when against the non-forfeiting side.
How? Because it is prohibited. You may dislike the rule, but it will be enforced nonetheless.
How so? Does he explain anything of my arguments at all?
In a full forfeit situation, you are never allowed to vote for the forfeiting side.
What more explanation do you need? You're allowed to vote the forfeiting side if you explain why from their arguments.
*******************************************************************
>Reported Vote: RationalMadman // Mod action: Removed
>Points Awarded: 3 points to Pro for arguments
>Reason for Decision: Pro clearly communicated their theory but both sides seemed ambiguous. It felt like Con was playing semantic games and just overloading me with information and trying too hard, I just couldn't grasp it. Pro clearly states how sharing the means of production rather than leaving it to a select few is optimal.
>Reason for Mod Action: This debate is a full forfeit debate. Per the site's voting policy, full-forfeit debates are not moderated unless the voter voted for the forfeiting side. Because the voter voted for the forfeiting side, this vote will be removed.
************************************************************************
*********************
Mod note: This is a FF debate so vote such as Pinkfreud08 are not moderated unless they vote for the forfeiting side
*********************