The Political, Social, and Religious Ideology of Hitler

Author: Critical-Tim

Posts

Total: 68
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 27,803
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@yachilviveyachali
Traditional Marriage was always foremost about providing a foundation for children. Not as a lifestyle choice, but as a duty to society. Many old people today are okay letting that responsibility slide because the sweet deep state convinced them it was okay to do so right along with the rest of tradition. So maybe their kids are not prostitutes, but they are increasingly far from the optimal parent for the next generation. "Live and let live" in a duty free world with zero obligations to society leaves zero support for the next generation, and that's a problem only natural extinction can cure.
yachilviveyachali
yachilviveyachali's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 154
0
2
3
yachilviveyachali's avatar
yachilviveyachali
0
2
3
-->
@Greyparrot
You have put it very well. 
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 13,470
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@yachilviveyachali
Do you see a fundamental universal purpose in the evolution of intellect, and therefore the further evolution of matter?

Why did humans not remain the same as other animals?

If there is no greater purpose beyond appeasing the whims of an archaic MANGOD, then why do you worry about the inconsequentiality of human functional existence?

What I am suggesting is, that all human behaviour is perhaps the inevitable consequence of a greater purpose.

Which would include, you worrying about what others do with their bodies, me not caring what others do with their bodies and others doing as they please with their bodies.


Nonetheless, material development goes on apace, unaffected by the whimsey of human overthink.


As for other peoples marriages and divorce, they are trivia that do not interest me much.

Though it is just as feasible to reside contentedly with a partner and family, without all the fuss and bother of a marriage contract.








yachilviveyachali
yachilviveyachali's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 154
0
2
3
yachilviveyachali's avatar
yachilviveyachali
0
2
3
-->
@zedvictor4
Do you see a fundamental universal purpose in the evolution of intellect, and therefore the further evolution of matter?
No. I think intellect is poorly understood, which renders it rather unimportant. A good heart, kind soul, and reverence for God are important. Intellectuals have no more good ideas about morality than tramps in the street. The Bible contains everything we need to know about God, the human, and the way we ought to be.

Why did humans not remain the same as other animals?
God blessed the planet with animals. Animals are all related to the human, His second-highest creation. Humans appear different because they possess an earthly dominion. The human has conceit and arrogance, and often less regard for the fellow human than animals have for their species.

As for other peoples marriages and divorce, they are trivia that do not interest me much.
I do not see the pain inflicted on children by adults as “trivia.” Every child deserves to be raised in a loving home, where the parents remain together. Divorce is an assault on marriage, and a torture to the children. This is, if they have children, which many divorced couples do. Divorce would also suggest that the husband or wife has betrayed their spouse (infidelity is the most common reason for divorce), and have therefore left the union in body and soul. Another common reason is “drifting apart”, which would tell us they were not committed to their spouse and never saw the marriage as a union that would last until death. Do you think society is helped by this? 

Though it is just as feasible to reside contentedly with a partner and family, without all the fuss and bother of a marriage contract.
The only people who believe this are those who do not want the hassle of divorce.
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 13,470
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@yachilviveyachali
Some might argue that you are traumatised by religious and social oppression.

And that your arguments are therefore stereotypical misunderstandings of the lives of ordinary people from different cultures, with differing viewpoints.

For example, I referred to the unnecessity of contractual marriage and divorce, which you turned into the completely separate issue of child abuse.

Child abuse is just as likely to occur within a contractual marriage as it might within any other sort of family arrangement.

Marriage cannot alter the mindset of a bad parent/s.



Further:

So if GOD bestowed us with intellect, then why is it "rather unimportant"?

This seems like a massive contradiction.

Not that in anyway I run with archaic Middle Eastern MANGOD hypotheses.

Though I do see such archaic ideas as being analogically representative of a greater universal purpose, wherein intellect is key to material development.

Call it a GOD principle if you like, but don't confuse this with a magical mystery man with a beard and sandals.


And by the way, the Bible was written by men who sought the power and authority to control and dictate the lives of others.

MANGOD was just symbolically representative of a punishment that awaited those who digressed...Basically mind control...Just as yours is controlled by your religious conditioning.
yachilviveyachali
yachilviveyachali's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 154
0
2
3
yachilviveyachali's avatar
yachilviveyachali
0
2
3
-->
@zedvictor4
And that your arguments are therefore stereotypical misunderstandings of the lives of ordinary people from different cultures, with differing viewpoints.
Well, if you want to call the Protestant faith a “different culture”, it would not be untrue. Catholics, although some get divorced, are less likely to get divorced. I come from a Jewish background, but have since turned to Christianity. I do not mean the lukewarm Protestant faith and its sects. Your country, even when it became Protestant, remained religious for some time. What happened? By the 19th century, the Age of Enlightenment had cemented secular, liberal thought across Europe. You and I are culturally different. When people talk about western values, they really mean to say secular values. Neither a real Christian nor a Muslim nor a Jew who remained true to their roots has anything in common with secularism. 

In case you didn't know, King Henry VIII is why Catholicism had to go in Britain. The reason? He wanted a divorce from his first wife. Pope Clement VII forbade it, so Henry established the Church of England. Then, he could remarry as much as he wanted. 

Child abuse is just as likely to occur within a contractual marriage as it might within any other sort of family arrangement.
It isn't. Children, whose parents stay together, are better off in every regard. They have more problems when parents divorce. It is not only about the parent being single, as children who are living with a stepfather or stepmother are more likely to be abused than when they are living with their natural parents. 

So if GOD bestowed us with intellect, then why is it "rather unimportant"?
Humans have free will, which I believe is mistaken for intellect. That we cannot be in agreement about what intellect is testament to its lack of importance. For instance, you and I clearly have a different idea of what intellect is.

God gave us much, much more, yet you think intellect is the best thing. 

Call it a GOD principle if you like, but don't confuse this with a magical mystery man with a beard and sandals.
He doesn't wear a beard and sandals. God is spirit, and has no physical body. The Bible says He is immortal and invisible. Why do the heathens think he wears a beard and sandals?

And by the way, the Bible was written by men who sought the power and authority to control and dictate the lives of others.
This is your opinion. It is an ignorant one. Care to support it?

MANGOD was just symbolically representative of a punishment that awaited those who digressed...Basically mind control...Just as yours is controlled by your religious conditioning.
I would not be Christian if I were controlled by religious conditioning. Jews do not believe Jesus is the messiah, do not like the New Testament, do not like many Christians, and denigrate Jesus in the Talmud. I don't believe in circumcision, do not observe Shabbat, and pray to the Father, Christ, and Mother Mary.
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 13,470
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@yachilviveyachali
I would not be Christian if I were not controlled by religious conditioning.
Probably not.


I for example were not not controlled by religious conditioning, therefore I am not theistic, nor am I deistic in a conventional sense.

I suppose that I am agnostic in so much as I hypothesise broadly about creation and existence...Therefore "GOD is spirit" is a reasonable analogical representation of creation and existence.



The Bible was written by Men, is an undeniable fact and does not require support.

As you said, "GOD is spirit".

And to suggest that biblical ideology and social control  have never been inextricably linked, is a tad naive to say the least.


And free will is always a moot point.


And perfection is not guaranteed by a ritual contract of marriage.

Good child care is guaranteed by good parents or guardians.


And for sure, I am well versed in British history.


FLRW
FLRW's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,892
3
4
8
FLRW's avatar
FLRW
3
4
8
-->
@yachilviveyachali

Why are you so hopped up on opiates?  Remember Religion is the opiate of the masses.