A plan that I think would be good.

Author: TheUnderdog

Posts

Total: 11
TheUnderdog
TheUnderdog's avatar
Debates: 5
Posts: 3,333
3
4
10
TheUnderdog's avatar
TheUnderdog
3
4
10
The left: "No human being is illegal.  Abolish ICE!"

Me: What if the US sent 200K Americans to Greenland, 700K to Iceland, had them live in these areas there for 5 years, and then they vote to get annexed by the US?  If Greenland and Iceland turn them down, we call these countries Ameriphobic bigots, and then basically what happened to Hawaii happens to Iceland and Greenland.  Basically what happened to Hawaii could happen to Greenland and Iceland.

No human being is illegal!  America Fuck Yeah!  God bless America!

Lets Diversify Iceland with people from different places with different perspectives (places like Texas, Florida, Tennessee, Missouri, Nevada, New Hampshire, Arizona, Utah, Virginia, North and South Carolina, Georgia).  Diversity is a strength!
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 273
Posts: 7,912
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
Peaceful conquest 😃
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 11,381
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@TheUnderdog
Let's release a good micro-organism and thin things down a bit.

Less messier than nuclear war.

And a far better plan.
TheUnderdog
TheUnderdog's avatar
Debates: 5
Posts: 3,333
3
4
10
TheUnderdog's avatar
TheUnderdog
3
4
10
-->
@zedvictor4
COVID was bad.  Lets not re do COVID and 2020.

Trump on T.V. (debateart.com) states you trashed Trump for not being tough enough on COVID because you didn't like COVID killing people (when the economy was at stake as well).

Now, you are literally advocating for a 2nd 2020.

Stop supporting the current thing!
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 11,381
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@TheUnderdog
Nope, something more efficient than 2020.

Needs to reduce World population by at least 50%.

Specifically, something that targets stupid genes. (Men with high testosterone levels)

Come on GOD give us a miracle.


Though there seems to be something of an evolving  demasculinization trend at the moment.

Might have potential in the long term.

But can the Planet wait. 

Of course it can.

The Planet doesn't give a toss.
TheUnderdog
TheUnderdog's avatar
Debates: 5
Posts: 3,333
3
4
10
TheUnderdog's avatar
TheUnderdog
3
4
10
-->
@zedvictor4
Needs to reduce World population by at least 50%.

Specifically, something that targets stupid genes. (Men with high testosterone levels)
Lets say some disease kills the top 55% of the world's population measured in testosterone levels.

That would mean about 10% of the female population would get killed as well as virtually every man.

I don't know your testosterone levels, but if you weren't able to for see that, it seems that you may have stupid genes.

testosterone distributions men vs women - Search (bing.com) states men tend to have 8x as much testosterone as women.  This means if X= male testosterone level, .125X would the the woman's.


.4/.125=3.2

Gay men have about 3.2x as much testosterone as straight women.

Your horrible idea would call for genociding the vast majority of straight and bisexual men, about 10% of the women, and even a huge number of gay men.

And you want this disease to exist.

Get that woke garbage out of here!
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 11,381
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@TheUnderdog
Would mass depletion of the human race caused by a naturally occurring micro-organism, be genocide.

Especially if it was an act of GOD.

And in the long term, can you not see the benefits.
TheUnderdog
TheUnderdog's avatar
Debates: 5
Posts: 3,333
3
4
10
TheUnderdog's avatar
TheUnderdog
3
4
10
-->
@zedvictor4
Would mass depletion of the human race caused by a naturally occurring micro-organism, be genocide.
If man made, yes.

Especially if it was an act of GOD.
Did I stutter?

And in the long term, can you not see the benefits.
No.  If I'm one of the people that would die, I wouldn't like it; the same would be true of you.

If you really believe that a plague would be beneficial to the world and that humans dying would be good, lead by example.  Otherwise, it would be hypocritical.
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 11,381
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@TheUnderdog
Why is something that is man-made, not naturally occurring?  (Nonetheless I did say naturally occurring) *


Isn't putting ones own fleeting universal existence first, a tad selfish?


And I'm prepared to take my chances, just as you would have to be.



*Everything that occurs within a Universe at any given moment is naturally occurring.



TheUnderdog
TheUnderdog's avatar
Debates: 5
Posts: 3,333
3
4
10
TheUnderdog's avatar
TheUnderdog
3
4
10
-->
@zedvictor4
Isn't putting ones own fleeting universal existence first, a tad selfish?
Yes, and it's okay to be selfish if your rationale is, "I don't want to commit suicide to nominally help the planet".
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 11,381
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@TheUnderdog
I think that chance is a lot fairer.

My body will give up the ghost of it's own accord soon, anyway...And I'm OK with that.

It's nicer not to know exactly when though.